Anonymous ID: a0a197 June 30, 2025, 3:05 p.m. No.23258526   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8531 >>8538 >>8555

Man admits to crucifying Arizona pastor, planned to 'execute' over a dozen other Christian leaders across the country

 

https://thepostmillennial.com/man-admits-to-crucifying-arizona-pastor-planned-to-execute-over-a-dozen-other-christian-leaders-across-the-country?utm_campaign=64530

Anonymous ID: a0a197 June 30, 2025, 3:42 p.m. No.23258640   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8646

Kim Dotcom Pardoned

 

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20500

June 30, 2025

 

Dear President Trump,

I am writing to respectfully urge you to exercise your constitutional authority to grant a full presidential pardon to Kim Dotcom, the founder of Megaupload, who has faced an unjust and politically motivated prosecution by the U.S. government for over a decade. Your recent pardon of Devon Archer, convicted of a $60 million fraud scheme, sets a powerful precedent for addressing prosecutorial overreach and political influence in our justice system. If a pardon is warranted for Archer, it is undeniably justified for Dotcom, whose case is marred by legal flaws, due process violations, and special-interest lobbying, with far-reaching implications for internet freedom and the Rule of Law.

 

The Case Against Kim Dotcom

In 2012, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted Kim Dotcom and Megaupload, a Hong Kong-based cloud storage company, on charges of criminal copyright infringement, racketeering, and conspiracy, alleging that the platform facilitated user-driven piracy. The government seized Megaupload’s global assets, shut down its servers, and initiated extradition proceedings against Dotcom, a New Zealand resident, without a hearing. This dramatic action, dubbed “Operation Debut,” involved a theatrical raid on Dotcom’s home, orchestrated for media impact rather than necessity.

 

The prosecution’s case rests on a theory of secondary copyright infringement, which does not exist in U.S. criminal law. Megaupload complied with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s (DMCA) safe harbor provisions, promptly responding to takedown notices and even granting copyright holders direct access to remove infringing links. Unlike direct infringement, which requires willful intent, Megaupload’s actions demonstrate a commitment to legal compliance, negating the mens rea required for criminal liability.

 

Moreover, the U.S. lacks jurisdiction over Megaupload, a foreign corporation with no U.S. offices or agents. The government has failed to serve a criminal summons under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 4, and U.S. copyright law does not apply extraterritorially to the 90% of Megaupload’s users located abroad. The seizure of assets and data, including that of millions of legitimate users (e.g., 15,634 U.S. military personnel), was executed ex parte, violating due process. Misrepresentations in warrant applications and illegal surveillance in New Zealand further taint the case, rendering it a textbook example of prosecutorial abuse.

 

Comparison to Devon Archer’s Case

Your pardon of Devon Archer on December 23, 2024, addressed concerns of political targeting by the Biden administration, given Archer’s ties to Hunter Biden. Archer was convicted of securities fraud and conspiracy, causing over $60 million in direct harm to victims, including a Native American tribe. His conviction followed a fair trial, with full due process, yet you deemed clemency appropriate, citing equitable and political considerations.

 

Kim Dotcom’s case presents a stronger case for clemency:

 

Lesser Culpability: Archer’s fraud was deliberate, with proven intent, whereas Dotcom’s charges rely on an untested legal theory with no evidence of willful infringement. Megaupload’s legitimate uses—storing personal files, business data, and academic materials—far outweigh any alleged piracy.

 

Due Process Violations: Unlike Archer’s fair trial, Dotcom’s case involves egregious abuses: asset seizures without notice, misrepresentations to courts, and illegal spying. These violations offend the Rule of Law, which your administration champions.

 

Jurisdictional Overreach: Archer’s case was within U.S. jurisdiction, but Dotcom’s prosecution extends U.S. law extraterritorially, threatening international sovereignty and internet freedom.

Anonymous ID: a0a197 June 30, 2025, 4:10 p.m. No.23258731   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8737

When the Aliens found Earth teaming with life of all kinds f diverse species, Large & small.Animal and plants they were amazed. But that's not what brought to the earth. They also found the earth rich in rare form of a gold Isotope used in how they move about and power their body armor.

Anonymous ID: a0a197 June 30, 2025, 4:30 p.m. No.23258802   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8805 >>8815

>>23258737

>>23258750

Wait for the synth's

 

Scientists have taken a bold and controversial step toward creating synthetic human DNA from scratch, a move some critics liken to 'playing God.'

 

The research aims to unlock new treatments for autoimmune disorders, heart failure, viral infections, and age-related diseases.

 

To do so, scientists are developing tools to build large, complex sections of human DNA in the lab and insert them into skin cells to observe how they function.

The video player is currently playing an ad. You can skip the ad in 5 sec with a mouse or keyboard

 

The ultimate goal is to construct entire human chromosomes, a foundational step toward assembling a fully synthetic human genome.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14855031/Scientists-warn-catastrophic-risks-labs-play-God-human-DNA.html