Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 7:31 p.m. No.23268433   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8455 >>8458 >>8460 >>8464 >>8469 >>8474 >>8478 >>8480 >>8485 >>8486 >>8493 >>8507 >>8511 >>8518 >>8520 >>8524

'We've got all the cards': Trump confident as House debates megabill(the last thing Trump said to Zelensky, “what cards do you have”? Its turns out that blew Z’s mind and destroyed any fake leverage Z had.Btw that video will be studied for decades of what exactly Trump did) Fox News' Peter Doocy reports the latest on the advancement of the president's 'big, beautiful bill' from the White House

 

4:19

 

https://youtu.be/_1IgEhWlCSY

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 7:58 p.m. No.23268528   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8537 >>8543

>>23268433does any anon exist here to give a comment?That was the best part of board, responses, sharing ideas, confirmation of theories, being called out, anons searching for answers, jokes, shitposting and learning for new anons. Hardly any of that exists now.

 

This repeating posts from years ago that have nothing to do with the post, is not interaction, giving no opinion or input to dig on anyone.

 

When an anon requests “call to dig” there is no response. Is this a total bot farm?

 

“where have all the autists and anons gone, long time waiting?”

 

Peter, Paul & Mary - Where Have All The Flowers Gone

 

3:54

 

https://youtu.be/jb2GiMSXJsg

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 8:06 p.m. No.23268566   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8575 >>8589 >>8695

Baker can you get rid of the hovering “quick reply”, it totally sucks and makes us do additional steps to post. Believe me anons can click on the link and go to the top.If anons are on a iPhone or android we can’t see what we are posting.it’s not a benefit

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 8:18 p.m. No.23268611   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23268461 I’m about to punch anyone that calls our country ademocracy. The brainwashing into majority rules is accepting any nitwits idea that their opinion is important

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 8:22 p.m. No.23268634   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8644

>>23268522Agree 100%, everyone knows there are large amount of perverts in the FBI, they wouldn’t have lasted if not. Is Kash that naive?

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 8:24 p.m. No.23268644   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23268634 why is to fuck to normal posts are green? Your bot seems to judge whats acceptable and what’s not baker. Can you update the thing that’s doing this?

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 8:48 p.m. No.23268743   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23268588

 

What does this mean, is that the UK?Tory went after his family, friends and closest allies. He survived not one but two assassination attempts on his life.

 

==

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 8:58 p.m. No.23268793   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8804 >>8823

>>23268628 These were the original political parties (and what they stood for)

Before there were donkeys and elephants, there were original political parties.

 

By Bethaney Phillips Updated May 12, 2023 4:56 AM PDT

political parties

Photo source: Pixabay

Get We Are The Mighty’s Weekly Newsletter

 

The United States hasn’t always been a multi-party system. Today, Republicans and Democrats make up a majority of the political population, while institutions like Reform, Libertarian, Socialist, Natural Law, Constitution and Green Parties all come into play. But before there were donkeys and elephants, there were original political parties…and a debate as to whether the parties should exist at all.

 

The First Party System

 

It began in 1792 with the country’s First Party System, which lasted until 1824. During this time there was the Federalist Party and the Anti-federalist party, which was known by several additional names, including the Democratic-Republican Party, and Jeffersonian Republic.

 

It’s worth noting that there were two parties based on talks among George Washington and his advisers, such as Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. However, these two advisers in particular were actually against political parties. So much so, they wrote the Federalist Papers, discussing the dangers of such allegiances. However, as time went on, they actually helped form the system itself, with Hamilton leading the Federalist party and Madison and Thomas Jefferson taking over the Democratic-Republicans.

 

Federalists

 

Led by Alexander Hamilton, he was Washington’s Secretary of Treasury. His stance was a strong, unified government. He also wanted a central bank system, staying close with Britain, and keeping close lines of communication between rich landowners and the government. They eventually lost power by remaining too selective, with few men meeting their standards.

 

alexander hamilton original political parties

Portrait of Alexander Hamilton by Walter Robertson. Circa 1794 (Wikipedia)

Democratic-Republicans

 

Meanwhile, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson were opposed to the Federalist ideas. Hence, their original name of the Anti-Federalists. They wanted everything the Federalist party did not want: less government involvement, rights to vote by the common man, and freedom in the banking system. By 1800 they came into power as the Jeffersonians, effectively taking over the Federalists. However, around 1824, at the end of James Monroe’s presidency, its support dwindled. The sense of unity that was once among Americans died down and Monroe’s attempt to lessen political party led way to an entirely new system.

 

The Second Party System

 

During this time, just after the election of 1824, new political parties were also in various stages of being formed, with certain states gaining more traction than others. This system lasted until the mid-1850s.

 

The Whig Party

 

Led by Henry Clay, a prolific politician who served in the Senate, House, and Secretary of State, evolved from the once Democratic-Republican Party. It was also evolved into the Anti-Jacksonian Party, the National Republican Party, and simply Republicans.

 

henry clay whig party

Henry Clay, founder of the Whig Party. (Public Domain)

Whigs wanted Congress to be the government’s executive branch. They grappled with others over the federal banking system — which eventually led to collapse and creation of state banks — and nepotism/favoritism among federal elected officials. With Whigs being for the former and against the latter. The party collapsed in the 1850s due to disagreements over slavery.

 

The Democratic Party

 

Hailing from Andrew Jackson’s beliefs, the Democrats were formed in 1828, making it today’s oldest political party. During the Second Party System, Jackson was at the head of the movement, pushing for a strong presidential power. (They wanted the President to remain over other government branches.) And they were against the Federal Government’s bank, the Bank of the United States. They also disliked programs that were becoming more modern, as they believed it would be at the expense of farmers. Democrats were pro-slavery, believing that it was a practice that helped boost farming and its profits.

 

The Third Party System

 

From the 1850s until the 1890s, the U.S. took on a third party system, featuring the previous Democrats and the newly formed Republican Party. https://www.wearethemighty.com/history/original-political-parties/

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 9:07 p.m. No.23268839   🗄️.is 🔗kun

‘This would be SUICIDAL’: Newt Gingrich warns GOP reps

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich joins ‘Hannity’ to assess the ‘big, beautiful bill’ as it gets voted on in the House of Representatives.

 

6:43

 

https://youtu.be/dSAVcamlXR0

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 9:08 p.m. No.23268849   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8951 >>9187 >>9218

WATCH: Speaker Johnson reveals latest on the House floor32 minutes ago

 

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has the latest on where votes for the 'big, beautiful bill' stand on 'Hannit

 

9:44

 

https://youtu.be/-1XmvQBqy3g

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 9:19 p.m. No.23268884   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8886 >>9187 >>9218

Rep. Jim Jordan makes BOLD prediction on ‘big, beautiful bill’

Hannity' panelists Mark Meadows and Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, discuss what's included in the 'big, beautiful bill.'

(Their adrenal glands must be shot be now)

 

6:51

 

https://youtu.be/9UUS17EjGow

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 9:32 p.m. No.23268932   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Trump to begin enforcing birthright citizenship order as early as this month, DOJ says

Retired ICE agent Victor Avila discusses the effect of President Donald Trump’s policies on migrant encounters at the southern border and more on ‘The Will Cain Show.’

 

3:01

 

https://youtu.be/ObSwVBmMnEg

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 9:37 p.m. No.23268956   🗄️.is 🔗kun

‘The Five’: Dems have a ‘big, beautiful meltdown’

The Five' co-hosts discuss Democrats' opposition to President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.

 

3:58

 

https://youtu.be/GIagbvia5-g

Anonymous ID: c010e6 July 2, 2025, 10:41 p.m. No.23269204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9216

Ask the Right Questions…

 

July 2, 2025 | Sundance |

… Put yourself in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s shoes against the backdrop of 35 previously exiled Russian officials from the United States as a result of the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment and Joint Analysis Report {BACKGROUND}.

 

QUESTION: What exactly would Vladimir Putin think about this admission from the CIA?

 

[Source]

 

CIA Director John Ratcliffe admits the former CIA and FBI fabricated the intelligence that led to the expulsion of Russian officials under the false premise of Russia “hacking” the 2016 election.Why now?

 

How would Putin interpret this very public message?

 

Then, consider the sequence….

 

President Trump said publicly he had no prior knowledge of the Ukraine drone attackagainst Russia’s long-range bomber fleet.

President Trump then held a phone call with Vladimir Putin to affirm his lack of forewarning.

President Trump then holds another phone call with Putin to discuss the Iran nuclear issues.

President Trump then publicly says at the G7 in Canada, it was a big mistake to take Russia out of the G8; further saying -repeatedly- that sanctions hurt both sides, and there is a cost to sanctions.

Trump then bombs the Iranian nuclear facilities; and two days later Putin says there is no doubt in his mind that President Trump is committed to peace.

The U.S. then delays sending additional patriot missiles to Ukraine.

Then today the U.S. says the 2016 predicate for removing Russian officials from the USA was based on fraud within the intelligence community, per CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

.

 

==These last three bullet points follow on the heels of India saying they have no intent to participate in another global trade currencyother than the U.S. Dollar=. India is the “I” in BRICS. With that in mind, what exactly was the intention of BRICS?

 

QUESTION: How would Russian President Vladimir Putin be viewing all of these events?

 

Let’s get the BBB passed.

 

Warmest regards.

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/07/02/ask-the-right-questions/