>>2327733

My take:

>forcing POTUS to answer about Q

Inappropriate.

1. Links him to 'conspiracy' tier stuff which is bad for optics

2. Detracts from the message the he will be trying to push at his speech. 90% of people still need to hear the vanilla stuff he is saying, and not the hardcore Q stuff.

>Forcing CNN to film signs

Appropriate.

Fuck CNN as much as possible and in whichever way you can, just don't drag POTUS into it.

>>2328062

Yeah, let POTUS/Q work on their own timeline.

But do what you can in the meantime on the ground level.

Spread the word, be creative, get the Q name out there, etc. But let POTUS do his own thing.