Who's "us?"
That's the thing, bud, I'm not a shill. They do have this pattern where if you give one whiff of disagreement that they accuse you of being what they are with projection. I just asked you a question, a common one that's used here for when people speak in first person plural as a collective, and look at your response.
>23279607
Whatever, faggot. I just asked a question about why you were speaking as a collective separate from everyone else here. Like it's a little club that only certain bakers are a part of or something. And your instinct was to accuse someone of being a shill for just asking "who's us?"
That's a straw man supporting someone else speaking as a collective.
I mean, it's kind of obvious, clowns. No mimicry, no merchants, just VaticanClown barely spamming, but a whole lot of trying to blend in and trying to speak from positions of authority occurring right now.
You're deflecting with changing the subject to be about the picture now. I have no interest in interacting with you. Filtered.
Reading the Bible must be having an effect on me or something. I'm becoming a nicer asshole. Much less prone to engage in trash talk or vitriol now.
But, I'm only about half way through Deuteronomy atm. Haven't got to the good parts yet.
Announcing a filter is cancer, huh? Now who wouldn't want people to filter by trying to shame people into that behavior change with a meme I wonder?
>>23279731
Saying every Jew is bad is like saying every cop is bad is like saying every Muslim is bad. When you clowns display the very behavior you accuse them of it kind of paints a different picture.
He's trying to program you, well anyone he can really, with Pavlovian repetition.
Oh, so you consider this place a commune, huh? And the bakers are executive officers of the commune, huh? That explains the bullshit entitlement then. This is not a commune, this is a collection of free thinkers, but Marxists and satanists desperately need a hive, or commune.
No one is above another here apparently, except for the bakers, they're the executive officers here. That's clown shoe desperation if I ever saw it, especially when some of them pad the notables with over 50% of their own posts. That's gaming the system for their benefit.
Your IP hop doesn't make your argument more convincing. It achieves the opposite in fact.
Yeah, if you're going to IP hop like the shills do, you honestly can't expect me to believe a single word you have to say. You said this is a commune, that the bakers are executive officers, putting them above everyone, and then when I called that out you backtracked and said it was just humorous prose.
When the money runs out then so does their motivation.