https://www.skunkbayweather.com/About.html
timelapse picture every 20 seconds, and then an hourly composite timelapse.
https://www.skunkbayweather.com/About.html
timelapse picture every 20 seconds, and then an hourly composite timelapse.
Q didn't say it was fast. from a distance of 10-20 miles (as an anon said last bread) and with a 20 second timelapse, the picture makes sense.
i think you misunderstand me, misunderstand the evidence, and/or misunderstand Q. but it's ok, it's all difficult to digest.
the jolly roger article was from late 2017.
if you don't think it's a tomahawk, i'm going to need some more understanding why.
the picture matches up, the timeframe matches up. camera facing north watching a missle arc to the northโฆlooks right to me.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcB4eJ6lHOY
oh yeah, that's an amazing shot, and it illustrates this perfectly. no smoke trail, just the flames.
that shot, as a timelapse, would look exactly like whidbey.
thanks, frend.
tomahawk range = 1550 miles (published - probably a bit more, since we usually 'underestimate' our mil capability)
from washington, it could hit some of the aleutians, for sure.
for the sake of discussion - what is your alternate/competing theory?
if i understand the Trident architecture correctly, every trident is a nuke.
i believe the distance between that island and hansville wa (the camera) to be about 1800 miles.
i strongly believe (but am open to alt suggestions) that it wasn't a trident (which requires many more launch steps) but something non-nuke.