Anonymous ID: 974710 July 7, 2025, 2:18 a.m. No.23288273   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8279

>>23287957

Coincidentally, the gov shut off public access to weather satellite imaging and data, permanently, effective June 30th, 2025. Less than a week later, these massive rain events happen. What a coincidence!

Anonymous ID: 974710 July 7, 2025, 2:29 a.m. No.23288288   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8297

>>23288082

It's common to read "no comment" or "I am not at liberty to discuss the details" from parties to suits at law. I don't know if this is true for criminal prosecutions or not, but one can speculate that if "the list" has been entered as evidence, or is part of an ongoing investigation, that Bondi, Patel et al might have been smacked down by the presiding judge and told to shut up about this until the cake is baked, else lose the case(s).

Anonymous ID: 974710 July 7, 2025, 2:51 a.m. No.23288310   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8317

>>23288193

Reflecting on the received wisdom that "They" always control both sides of any serious controversy or conflict,…

Perhaps the point of this whole movie is to un-brainwash people so the people don't trust authorities, think for themselves and do their own research? Kinda like Q kept telling anons to do. That would explain the flip-flop on the client list.

Anonymous ID: 974710 July 7, 2025, 3:05 a.m. No.23288336   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23288297

After the investigation comes the Grand Jury presentation, then the indictment, then the prosecution, then the conviction, then the sentencing. Only then are the parties privvy to the full evidence free to comment.

Anonymous ID: 974710 July 7, 2025, 4:33 a.m. No.23288540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8549

>>23288458

The way I've always understood it, Hallowe'en costumes are supposed to "scare away" the "evil spirits," so that everyone's safe to celebrate the next day, "All Saints' Day."

 

From this perspective, Hallowe'en costumes are SUPPOSED to be scary rather than "princesses," "fairies," packs of cigarettes, assorted natural animals etc.

Anonymous ID: 974710 July 7, 2025, 4:58 a.m. No.23288624   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8625

>>23288494

>covered up an elite pedophile ring.

 

So you consider covering up the ring to be worse than participating in said ring, while also covering it up and pardoning others in the ring?

Anonymous ID: 974710 July 7, 2025, 5:26 a.m. No.23288695   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23288564

How is it preferable for the world's richest man, who became wealthy thanks to massive taxpayer subsidies for his businesses, to build from scratch a political party that he would totally control? As opposed to a very rich, but middle-of-the-pack as far as oligarchs go, businessman who worked within an established party, weathered the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, and against all odds, reformed said party into a decent representation of a comfortable majority of actual Americans?