That would certainly cement Qs place as a faggot
Ivanka by marrying Jared showed no business acumen
Silly fuckee was millions in debt
Ip hop?
Cool….then by reason
Anon switched cell towers and will throughout day until the travel is done….
None the less
There is no Q in the public domain…
Not yet
All there is
Is the Dollar General version
Qanon
Moderna?
In October 2013, DARPA awarded Moderna up to approximately $25 million to research and develop potential mRNA medicines to primarily support our vaccine and antibody programs to protect against Chikungunya infection.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is an American private foundation founded by Bill Gates and Melinda French Gates.
In January 2016, we entered a global health project framework agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases.
Keks in Mod Eisley
If only anon could put Jeffrey Epstein being drug by the neck by a Bantha across the bottom of the screen
1/3
Tom Fitton of "Judicial Watch" weighed in on the latest information out of the FBI and DOJ published by Axios about Jeffrey Epstein this morning on Bannon's "War Room" podcast. TOM FITTON: I don't know. I read the memo three or four times again this morning, and it's—it's really—I don't think even the Biden administration would have written anything like this. I just don't think they could have thought they could get away with it. And I gotta wonder what is going on at the leadership of the Justice Department and the FBI, to allow them to think that statements like the following… This is a classic. Of course, we're suing for this stuff, right? And so—they say: “The systematic review revealed no incriminating client list.” So, there is a client list—but it's not incriminating, so therefore you can't see it? Then they say: “There is also no credible evidence that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions.” Well, give us the incredible evidence! Then: “We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.” So they uncovered evidence, but it wasn’t enough to predicate an investigation? You can go line by line and kind of analyze this. It may be unfair or overly critical. But in my view, unless you have the records to back up the conclusions you've drawn in a case such as this, this isn’t worth much. And it's disturbing that it was leaked to Axios. Second time there's been a leak to Axios, by the way, by this Justice Department and FBI. Remember—we sued for the Biden videotapes of his interview with Hur. We were in court, literally in federal court. They’re stonewalling us. And what do they do? They give it to Axios. Here they give this memo to Axios, and this memo by the way, kind of drips with contempt—for people like you, Bannon, for Judicial Watch, for anyone asking questions. Give us the documents!
2/3
STEVE BANNON: Judicial Watch. No, listen—we love Marc Caputo. We've had him on the show, we’re going to have him on the show again because they leaked to him the Kennedy, the massive CIA leak. So you got Fitton, you got Bannon, you got Solomon. So hang on. I have no problem with Mike Allen and Axios. It is the consensus thinking of the apparatus, OK? Also, some people at the White House are quite close to these people. So this was a well-thought-through leak to a super prominent outlet—particularly late at night, more than Drudge, everybody reads Axios on a Sunday night. But I just want, for the audience, to be very specific—Judicial Watch and Tom Fitton are suing DOJ, I think also the FBI. What are you suing about? Why is your suit so important to this? And this is kind of a response to your suit, brother. TOM FITTON: Well, we saw the kind of cluster with the release of the documents to the social media people—many of whom are friends of ours, and that’s fine. But then they said, well, there were materials that were withheld by the FBI. So—give us all the Epstein records. We want the death records, we want the stuff about what the FBI withheld. Talk to us about how that happened, and give us the records—genuinely, and quite broadly. Instead, it's been radio silence. It's been three months of no records. We haven’t even gotten the file they leaked to the social media influencers. And in court the other day—I think I tweeted it out—I think they used the phrase “exceptional circumstances.” I guess the exceptional circumstance was they were writing a memo for Axios. So the court hasn’t been told any of this. They've made the conclusion that we’ll get no more documents, it looks like—or that a good number of documents will be withheld. And what's good about the lawsuit is that everything they're saying here, they’re going to have to justify in court. What records are you withholding? “Oh, they're under seal.” Let’s talk about that. Let’s describe what types of records are under seal. What records can’t be disclosed because they’re under seal, etc. Whose privacy would be violated if records were released? All the excuses they’re making here—they’re going to have to bolster in court. And memo or no memo, our lawsuit’s continuing.
3/3
STEVE BANNON: No, but why have they not—just very simple. By the way, Pam Bondi—we covered her wall to wall. I’ve known her for years. I consider her a friend. We were huge supporters when Gates dropped out. She was kind of next man—not President Trump—on her. Fine. Kash—it goes without saying, a co-host, almost like a brother to us. Dan Bongino—one of the heroes of our movement. So this is not personal. But why—just because this is not my line of country—why has DOJ not just done one basic thing and gone to the courts and said: “We want to unseal all the records associated with Epstein so the American people can see it”? Why? This is supposed to be the most transparent administration ever. Why has that not even happened? Why are they fighting that? TOM FITTON: Because they're "not going to keep perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein"—and say "no further disclosure will be appropriate or warranted." That’s what they're telling the American people: “All of the concerns you have about Epstein are unfounded.” And how are they unfounded? Because we reviewed the evidence we're not going to give to you—and concluded that there's no there there. And there may be no there there—but show us the records. This just shows contempt for the people's right to know. I’ve said it once, I’ve said it before: the Justice Department and the FBI are irredeemably compromised and corrupted. The leadership needs to understand that and act accordingly. I mean the FBI moving to another building? That’s nice. I tell you what—we’ve got three extra offices, maybe two, at Judicial Watch. We can lend them. That’s all they should need after Kash Patel shuts down the the agency and he’s the only one there—with a guy there to check his emails for him.
Puts him in a controlled environment where then the "collection" can be whisked away for "safe keeping"
The hand is covered