Q I'm case you are of a mind to answer.
@realeyethespy - partially clued in follower or waste of time?
Thank you my friend.
If Q and DJT wanted to send us an attaboy, that would certainly do it.
Sauce on this please?
I ask because a search I did brings up no mention.
Thank you for this. I am interested enough in @eyerhespy to want to discern his motives:
1) well intentioned anon. We have doctors, lawyers, and probably an Indian chief contributing to the cause here. It is not unlikely that he could be a NSA puke who is red pilled and interpreting the GA the best he can given his knowledge set. I mean, who here hasn't made a wrong prediction.
B) A real NSA analyst whose mission has "bumped up" to Q's. I mean, who here thinks the 10 people in Q's circle are the only ones involved in their operations? When Q said "no outside comms" I take that to mean nobody else speaks for Q. There may be others with tangential knowledge. Heck we have gotten comms from POTUS, does that count as outside comms?
4) he is intentional disinformation by the bad guys. If so, he frankly seems like someone who runs at the mouth a bit, meaning he might be a good source of Intel on the plans of the cabal.
E) He just wants to "corsi"… get famous off of the movement. If so, he is doing a really bad job monetizing it.
My fear is that he is A) and we are going to discredit everything he says because he is claiming to be NSA, and a Q devotee.
I would hate to cast away a useful patriot just because he happens to have a higher security clearance than the rest of us.
Not just him. We turn others into pariahs too quickly. If they aren't trying to make bank on Q or trying to discredit him (neither of which Eye has done) I think we need to be a little slower on the trigger.
One anon's opinion.