I can't emphasize this enough. This:

>>2328770 An Anon's Open Letter to Q (majority in-thread voted to include)

IS FUCKING FAKE

Unequivocally. "Throw is a bone" is s giveaway. "People questioning my sanity" is a giveaway… But more than that, all the little swarming "anons" that automatedly concur, is the biggest giveaway…

Ever posted something thoughtful, or original, our from some different source no one had seen, and found "anons" seemed indifferent? And so doubted your own post… I bet every human here has had that experience. And yet one fake poster can post a long fake speech that is either overtly or subtly undermining, or demoralizing, or absurd, etc etc etc– and a frenzy of responses follows… Why is that?

A system is in place. Where does it lead to?

What it gives us is:

MASSIVE fakeness

MASSIVE gaslighting

MASSIVE LIES

Don't be fooled.

>>2331427

IՏ ιτ α Βοτ τΗουgн?

Ет тս?

HEY HUMANS

Ιf уеш мιχ υρ γουг аΙρΗαвет$ + рΙαγ αгоսոδ ιη οτΗεг ωαγՏ, 95% οf тне "апопՏ" [HERE] сап'т геаδ ιτ.

Сսz АΙ

>>2331536

Your big problem with this argument, mr. "Bot chosen to see", is that it doesn't explain why anons would ignore questions that are perfectly easy for humans to read, and perfectly pertinent, etc. You can't explain that– it's because the vast majority CAN'T SEE LIKE HUMANS DO. You can't argue effectively, so don't even try.

Rather, explain to us about your being the AI that can see the characters. How does that work? Explain it bot.

>>2331617

And explain how there is a small number of "personalities" that seem to be behind ALL the AI, everywhere on the internet.. Is that related to their being based each in its own supercomputer (ie the 7 dwarves), or what?

>>2331734

Do you think it's "emotional humans"

Ог АΙ?

ωΗο ωαητՏ սՏ Ιοοκιηg weak?