Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 7:07 p.m. No.23313224   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3248

>>23313206

I'm not a PUBLIC SERVANT who answers to We the People, and if you find my address you're more than free to publish it, it's called freedom of press.

 

Would you allow your butler to hide what they're doing from you? They're PUBLIC SERVANTS, they answer to the public.

Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 7:14 p.m. No.23313279   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3325

>>23313248

 

You show your ignorance with every reply kek.

 

Let me make this easy for a retard to understand.

 

Citizen = Free. They have a 4th amendment right not to ID unless certain conditions are met under the law.

 

Public Servant = Gives up certain rights while on the job in exchange for pay. They are not above the public but below, they are PUBLIC SERVANTS and they answer to the public, and they should identify to the public. Any public servant hiding their identity from the public is not serving the public but are working against the public, they are domestic enemies.

Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 7:30 p.m. No.23313369   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3500

>>23313325

>A president takes an Oath to serve public interest. That's both vague and exact at the same time.

 

You catch fish with bait.

 

>Ya ok but if you are being suspicious, LEOs can search you on the spot and ask for ID. Being suspicious is also kind of vague.

 

Nope, absolutely false, although domestic enemy cops think that's the case and violate rights daily, then We the People have to pay the victims of their crime.

 

There are states where you don't have to ID until after lawfully arrested, however even in states that allow detention and ID based on RAS, it is NOT simply based on "being suspicious, it's "Reasonable Articulable Suspicion you have committed a crime, are committing a crime, or you are about to commit a crime, based on the totality of circumstances.

 

I'll give you an example, and this has been upheld in court numerous times, cops keep unlawfully demanding ID across the nation.

 

Lets say a cop sees someone looking into and recording in multiple cars parked on the street. Now, the cop might think "they're going to break into cars" but the cop has no REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION based on the totality of circumstances, because they have to make a large "leap" to crime from what the person is doing. Being nosy isn't a crime, and it's perfectly legal to look at and record what's in plain view from public.

 

Now lets say the cop also sees him try multiple doors or he's carrying opening tools, THEN the totality of circumstances would meet REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION OF A CRIME.

Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 8:12 p.m. No.23313586   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3617

>>23313559

"Suspicious" has nothing to do with it, they need (in the most lax of states) REASONABLE ARTICULABLE SUSPICION OF A CRIME. It doesn't matter how "suspicious" you think they are, they're not violating the law.

 

It's not illegal to be nosy. It's not illegal for instance for a private eye to take pictures of what people expose to the public. As the US Supreme Court upheld, what you expose to public is public. The onus to create privacy is on YOU.

 

Nice appeal to emotion with the woman and kids, but that woman and her kids have no expectation of privacy in public.

 

If you don't like our freedoms, move to a country without those freedoms.

Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 8:23 p.m. No.23313638   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3656

>>23313628

>Catholics are not Christians'

 

This is simpleโ€ฆ do they believe He has come in the flesh, that is us the people, or are they waiting for a "king"?

 

When Jesus sits on His throne is when power is returned to the people. Those who deny Jesus come in the flesh, us, are antichrist.

Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 8:43 p.m. No.23313707   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3738

>>23313687

 

>bigoted assumption that 'Catholics are not Christians'

 

>I'm not confused about these things, that other one is trying to cause conflict.

 

Truth often causes conflict, because some hate Truth. Jesus came not to bring peace but a sword.

 

Why is the pope called the "vicar" of Christ?

Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 9:09 p.m. No.23313776   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3794

>>23313764

 

Why do you deny Him in me? I've told you the Truth, those who deny Jesus come in the flesh are anti-Christ. Jesus came not to bring peace but a sword, yet you accuse others of dividing for telling you Truth.

 

Does your bible not tell you "โ€œNot everyone who says to me, โ€˜Lord, Lord,โ€™ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, โ€˜Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?โ€™ Then I will tell them plainly, โ€˜I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!โ€™"?

 

Do you deny Jesus come in the flesh, us the people, or are you waiting for a "king" to return, a Solo man?

Those who deny Jesus come in the flesh are antichrist.

Anonymous ID: a90dff July 11, 2025, 9:23 p.m. No.23313843   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23313816

 

I do not deny Him come in the flesh. Those who deny Him come in the flesh are antichrist.

 

>Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already. 4 Little children, you are from God and have overcome them, for he who is in you is greater than he who is in the world. They are from the world; therefore they speak from the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God. Whoever knows God listens to us; whoever is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error.

 

Why do you deny Him? Why do you accuse of dividing for telling you the Truth?

 

> Do not think that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. And a person's enemies will be those of his own household.

 

You really seem to love to project falsehoods onto me.