Anonymous ID: 3f7690 July 28, 2018, 6:18 p.m. No.2332163   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2370 >>2460 >>2510

I noticed John Deere is running $$$ through Loop Capital. As someone who relies on them for equipment needs, I have not enjoyed dealing with them for the past few years. This perhaps explains some things. Also, the push for center pivot irrigation tapping into and seriously reducing the aquifers is not cool. And the new chemicals Engenia/ExtendiMax, which are dicamba formulations that are not well contained in/on the fields, with 2-4D variations upcoming. I don't really think many of the other farmers around here realize it, but the direction things are going is kind of suspect, and definitely not good for anybody. But I dare not say it other than anonymously. Things get ugly if you question the "wonderful" new chemicals that we all "need"โ€“it's like they've been brainwashed. Or lied to and they don't know but to believe whatever the reps tell them. I actually wonder if the chem. companies have paid some of the angrier farmer voices to try to quell any questioning. Whatever it is, it's working. Husband anon just asked one question about one of the new chemicals at one meeting and it turned ugly instantly. We are aware that a farmer in Arkansas got shot over it last year. No more questions! Very effective!!

??

 

Farmer vs. farmer

The fight over the herbicide dicamba has cost one man his life and turned neighbor against neighbor in East Arkansas.

 

At the peak of summer in the little town of Monette in Craighead County, the soybeans and cotton in surrounding fields a jealous green, the pear tree that stands 20 feet from the grave of Mike Wallace looks like it has been blowtorched, every leaf blighted, curled and black at the edges. It's the ugly residue of drifting dicamba, the herbicide for which Wallace literally gave his life.

 

According to investigators, on Oct. 27, 2016, Wallace, who farmed 5,000 acres of corn, soybeans and cotton near the Arkansas/Missouri border, arranged by phone to meet a farmhand named Allan Curtis Jones, 26, of Arbyrd, Mo., on West County Road 38 north of the Mississippi County town of Leachville to discuss Wallace's suspicions that the farm where Jones worked was the source of drifting dicamba that had damaged some of Wallace's crops. Wallace, who had been vocal in his opposition to the herbicide, had been quoted in an August 2016 story in The Wall Street Journal, telling the newspaper that at least 40 percent of his soybean crop had been damaged by drifting dicamba since June. He'd filed complaints twice with the Arkansas State Plant Board, the state agency that oversees claims of crop damage, about damage from drifting dicamba and had encouraged other farmers to report their damage as well.

 

When Wallace and Jones met outside of Leachville, Jones brought along his cousin and a gun. According to statements issued by Mississippi County Sheriff Dale Cook at the time of the shooting, Jones told investigators that an argument had ensued. In the midst of it, Wallace, who was not carrying a weapon, grabbed Jones by the arm. At that point, investigators say, Jones pulled away, pulled his pistol, and fired into Wallace's body until the magazine was empty. Wallace, a father of two who'd farmed in Mississippi County since he was a boy, was hit at least four times, and died in the dust on the south shoulder of the county road, with Jones' cousin using his shirt in a futile attempt to stop the bleeding.

 

https://www.arktimes.com/arkansas/farmer-vs-farmer/Content?oid=8526754

Anonymous ID: 3f7690 July 28, 2018, 6:39 p.m. No.2332415   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2443

Here's a Supreme court decision that we can use against the fascist regime.

 

OCTOBER TERM, 2009

Syllabus โ€“ (Slip Opinion)

 

NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (head note) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337.

 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Syllabus

 

HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. v. HUMANI-TARIAN LAW PROJECT ET AL. [6]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holder_v._Humanitarian_Law_Project

 

We could use it against them for funding the drug cartels. We fund them to some extent, 'through government subsidies' for their war on drugs. They, the powers that want all control, have documents from the Justice Dept. to prove it.

 

If we fund the Middle Eastern country, which I shall not name, that has attacked humanitarian ships headed to Palestine, aren't we complicit? Common sense? What happened to reality?

 

Interesting find: If logic serves me at all; wouldn't it be logical that if a country, that tptw support, commits crimes with their funded 'dollars' then tptw would be complicit. Legal ease at its finest.

 

We the people should look at this closely. If the ruling elite can enact these laws are United States citizens responsible, as a whole, for crimes committed by tptw? I'm sure the lawyers know that the answer is yes. But, if the USA is a corporation, wouldn't the controllers be in question? We know that answer.

 

So โ€ฆ if we bankrupt the controllers, they will have nowhere to run. They owe everyone on the planet. Some of these controllers are already in prison. They then can be tried for aiding and abetting terrorist activities. If the fed printed money to fund these ongoing enterprises, well, at this point we could just pile up the charges. We know that any money that they pay their lawyers with would be fraudulent money so we could get them on aiding and abetting. Taking fraudulent money? Counterfeit money. The Federal Reserve is a private enterprise, if they are known backers of USA Inc. they can be brought in on charges. I've saved the best for last: We can take the President down because he enacts the law with his signature. Complicit. We will get the Constitution back. And soon it is going to be very easy.

 

There is also the question of others who have ridden the wave of deceit on your backs, they might be your cellmates! In case you are unclear as to my meaning, here's some clarification: bribe takers.