>>2332843

1st off, MetalBaker is great at dealing with hecklers and clowns, that level of cool level headed response and appropriate non response is something to be emulated.

a point to ponder

as a baker you exercise your editorial discretion (with your bias) to collect notables.

is there anything wrong with another anon with a different editorial bias collecting notables?

I agree that 'Anon Notables' is a bit offensive in the amount of (you)s (the self promotion is bad form)

But can you honestly say that having a second viewpoint of what is notable is a bad thing?

content vs container / presentation

>>2333090

>Posting to taunt current baker is not cool!!

I agree wholeheartedly that is where the anon crosses the line and hurts anons feelings.

It's a tactic, whether it's an ego driven anon who thinks their contributions are going unnoticed or an actual divisionfag shill is impossible to tell at this point.

Ignore it.

harvest the notables no matter who contributes them if they are notable

>>2333164

it goes slowly

>>>/comms/2019

>>>/comms/2041

>>>/comms/2051

should be caught up to real-time in less than a week.