There are a few of those
Canada #80
House Republicans Block Democrat-Led Effort to Force Release of Epstein Files to the Public — Here Are the Five Republicans Who Voted Against Transparency
by Jim Hᴏft Jul. 15, 2025
In a jaw-dropping move late Monday, House Republicans once again slammed the door shut on transparency, voting 7‑5 in the Rules Committee to block Rep. Ro Khanna’s amendment that would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to publish all Epstein‑related files publicly.
Last week, Rep. Ro Khanna (D‑CA) announced he will introduce an amendment on Tuesday, forcing a House vote to release the full trove of Epstein-related files to the public.
The same party that spent years stonewalling investigations, blocking the release of Epstein’s client list, and downplaying his vast connections to the global elite is now suddenly pretending to care about transparency.
Jeffrey Epstein was a monster, but his real ties were to the Democrat elite. Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s Lolita Express at least 26 times, rubbing elbows with the pedophile financier while jet-setting around the world.
“Why are the Epstein files still hidden? Who are the rich & powerful being protected?” Khanna wrote on Saturday.
“On Tuesday, I’m introducing an amendment to force a vote demanding the FULL Epstein files be released to the public. The Speaker must call a vote & put every Congress member on record.”
He continued, “Will the House allow a vote on Tuesday on the Khanna Amendment demanding the full release of the Epstein files?”
In a 7–5 late-night Monday vote, House Republicans on the Rules Committee shut down a Democratic-led amendment spearheaded by Rep. Ro Khanna (D‑CA).
The measure would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice to publish all Jeffrey Epsteinrelated documents-including flight logs, communications, and purported client lists—on a publicly accessible website within 30 days.
Only one brave Republican, Rep. Ralph Norman (R‑S.C.), defied party pressure and sided with Democrats, while Texas Rep. Chip Roy wisely abstained.
Here are the names of the U.S. Representatives who voted “No” to releasing the Epstein files:
Virginia Foxx (R-NC)
Nick Langworthy (R-NY)
Austin Scott (R-GA)
Morgan Griffith (R-VA)
Brian Jack (R-GA)
Michelle Fischbach (R-MN)
Erin Houchin (R-IN)
“Rules voted 5-7 to block the full House from voting on my amendment to have a FULL release of the Epstein file. People are fed up. They are fed up. Thanks @RepRalphNorman. Need to put the American people before party!” Khanna wrote on X.
More:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/07/house-republicans-block-democrat-led-effort-force-release/
>>23330809
>neither side wants to admit there is a fake Trump/double making false statements
What evidence do you have for this?
That's it?
First there's this
South Africa #14
Is Jeffrey Epstein the “Robert Maxwell” of the US?
“FBI & DOJ Make SHOCKING Jeffrey Epstein Claims: Mike Benz Drops MAJOR Bombshell On Client List”
Premiered Jul 7, 2025
35:45 – “But the conditions put on it were that the CIA was able to have a DOJ attorney embedded from the CIA in order to midwife the prosecution in order to ensure that no evidence was admitted in trial.that revealed the CIA network involved… So they got the prosecution but they kept the CIA secrecy. By the way, this is all public now thanks to Tulsi Gabbard. You can look at the 1966 and 1967 CIA memos on Orlando Masferrer on the March 2025 releases if you want to see all these documents.”
Vid (45:40)
https://youtu.be/1roULPXhUJk
>>23330971 (me)
Same post includes this, but somebody wanted it gone
“Mike Benz: DOJ Pointing Attention At FBI Instead Of CIA In Epstein Case Is Not A Good Look For Transparency”
July 9, 2025
"Foundation For Freedom Online" founder Mike Benz, with Jesse Kelly, traces Jeffrey Epstein's almost certain connections to U.S. intelligence networks back to the early 1980s and Iran-Contra.
"What I'm trying to communicate here is every aspect of the Epstein story ties into the restructuring of intelligence work after the 1970s, when the CIA was barred from many activities directly. That’s when USAID and the NGO web (National Endowment for Democracy, Internews, US Institute of Peace, etc.) took the baton from the CIA and took over covert operations."
"Jeffrey Epstein was present at the creation of that entire apparatus. There is zero chance on God's green earth that there are no CIA files on him. The fact that the Justice Department is pointing us to the FBI when this is a CIA job is not a good look for transparency."
"I don’t think of him as a blackmailer. I think of him as a dealmaker," Benz said. "That doesn’t make the story any less dark. If Epstein was being used for backchannel diplomacy or intelligence gathering, the American people and the world have a right to know. But given the DOJ’s handling of this, it doesn’t look like we’re getting answers anytime soon."
"With that scale of operations and number of witnesses, things can get away from you. Often, there’s a turf battle between the CIA and the State Department."
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/07/09/mike_benz_tracing_jeffrey_epsteins_intelligence_connections_back_to_iran-contra.html
There was an anon quite a few nights ago that opined the List was going to get delayed and teased about until the democrats were the ones screaming for its release the loudest. This seems to be coming to pass.
Like with tech modifications? Star Trek called them the Borg
He's not new
He's th one spamming the Gould shit until he loss his cool and starts spouting off about "bootlickers" or the "marxist leninist maoist" etc that calls for sheriff to form a posse on occasion as well