If (((they))) are trying to start a nuclear war then if there's a nuclear strike (or launch) against CONUS and all intel points at Russia or China then there would be no choice but to retaliate.
Therefore there is a constant threat of having to kill.
… is one way it could be read.
There's a lot of economic theory to unravel there. If everyone is comfortable then there is no struggle, no drive to achieve.
No, I think a lot of that 'wealth' was conjured out of thin air in the first place. The way to do it is tie the economic unit of value to real resources, like gold, or a secure (and fast) crypto currency.
That levels the playing field. You don't have corrupt pricks inventing money to gobble up resources that aren't rightfully theirs by toil.
I think there should be an absolute minimum of basic subsistence for those who want it, otherwise it creates desperation and resentment, and that creates theft and killing. And that's not communism, it's common sense, especially if it is achieved through some form of work.
At the end of the day though humans are corrupt beings so corruption will always exist in any system, it's just that today things are so far out of whack it is becoming really obvious.
Thanks anon, only mentioned China as it is the other main nuclear power. All signs to me point to (((them))) trying to set something off between US and Russia. Russian hackers narrative, Russian collusion narrative, NATO spending etc.