Anonymous ID: acc791 July 18, 2025, 9:51 a.m. No.23344132   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4285

Looming Epstein vote has Republicans eager to leave Washington

A discharge effort from Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna could put members on the spot as soon as next week.

 

Massie said he isn't concerns if members go home before his discharge petition ripens. “This will build momentum over August,” he said. “They can't sweep it under the rug.” | Francis Chung/POLITICO

 

By Meredith Lee Hill and Mia McCarthy07/17/2025 12:39 PM EDT

House Republican leaders are under fierce internal pressure to send members home for the summer amid deepening anxiety over a possible vote on the Jeffrey Epstein controversy.

 

Many GOP lawmakers fear being cornered by an expected “discharge petition” that would force a House vote on publicizing Epstein-related records. Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) launched the effort Tuesday, making it available for signatures and a possible floor vote as soon as next week.

 

Democrats have already forced Republicans to take tough Epstein-related procedural votes that have stoked a barrage of constituent calls into GOP offices, but they have not yet been able to force a clear up-or-down vote on releasing the so-called Epstein files.

 

(Seems like some of those members met Epstein.)

 

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/17/jeffrey-epstein-house-discharge-vote-00459758

Anonymous ID: acc791 July 18, 2025, 9:59 a.m. No.23344186   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4200

Russ Vought: Appropriations process ‘has to be less bipartisan’

The OMB director said more rescissions packages could soon be headed to the Hill.

Katherine Tully-McManus

07/17/2025, 11:11am ET

 

Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought isn’t interested in giving assurances to lawmakers on Capitol Hill that the White House will abide by any bipartisan spending agreements made this year.

 

“The appropriations process has to be less bipartisan,”Vought told reporters at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast Thursday.

 

With Republicans in full control of government, he said now is the time for reining in spending, even without input from Democrats on Capitol Hill. He did not lay out a legislative path for partisan spending bills to clear the Senate, where 60 votes are required to pass legislation.

 

Vought said he’s looking to “change the paradigm” of the way appropriations has worked, pointing to the continued use of stopgap spending bills.

 

“It’s not going to keep me up at night, and I think will lead to better results, by having the appropriations process be a little bit partisan,and I don’t think it’s necessarily leading to a shutdown,”he added.

 

Majority Leader John Thune, however, said Vought’s assertion “runs contrary” to the Senate’s mathematical reality that Republicans need Democratic support to avoid a shutdown when the current stopgap funding bill expires on Sept. 30.

 

“It’s going to take 60 [votes] to fund the government,” said Thune, adding, “we plan to move [appropriations] bills that will have cooperation from the Democrats.”

 

Yet Vought, when specifically asked if he would reassure Democratic appropriators that the White House would abide by bipartisan spending agreements or commit to not using rescissions on future appropriations bills,he simply said he would not.

 

“There is no voter in the country that went to the polls and said, ‘I’m voting for a bipartisan appropriations process,’” Vought said. “That may be the view of something that appropriators want to maintain.”

 

His comments on the appropriations process come as the White House is on the precipice of a major win with the first partisan rescissions package expected to pass the House this week.

 

“We are willing to send up additional rescissions. I think if this continues to pass, we’re likely to send up another rescissions package that would come soon, and we’ll be working on that to try to get that across the finish line,” Vought said.

 

Democrats were incensed.(as always)

 

“Russ Vought is boasting about how he isn’t interested in following the laws Congress passes and, of course, vowing to send up another rescissions package soon,” said Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, panel in a statement. “It is past time that Republicans stand up for Congress as a co-equal branch of government.”

 

Vought said he was “willing to work with Democrat appropriators if they conduct themselves with decorum” but that he’s seeking “a great relationship with” Republicans on the House and Senate spending panels.

 

He did acknowledge that federal spending power lies with Congress, even as he seeks to override their final spending decisions, while adding, “It is one of the most constitutional foundational principles, but that power of the purse does not mean — It’s a ceiling. It is not a floor.”

 

Vought also reiterated his view, and that of President Donald Trump, that the 51-year-old Impoundment Control Act, which bars the president from withholding congressional-approved funds without asking Congress, is unconstitutional.

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/07/17/congress/russ-vought-appropriations-process-has-to-be-less-bipartisan-00459479

 

Yes do exactly what democrats do, fuck em

Anonymous ID: acc791 July 18, 2025, 10:02 a.m. No.23344200   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23344186

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Thursday that President Donald Trump should dismiss Russ Voughtafter the White House budget director called for the government funding process to be “less bipartisan.”

 

“Donald Trump should fire Russell Vought immediately before he destroys our democracy,” Schumer told reporters just off the Senate floor. Schumer had said that he heard the White House was walking back Vought’s comments, which were made at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast with reporters, but added that if “they believe his comments are wrong, all the more reason they should fire him.”

JORDAIN CARNEY

07/17/2025, 3:28PM ET

 

==Sorry Chuckie, it’s never going to

happen== go back to Palestine!

 

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/07/17/congress/schumer-vought-omb-appropriations-00460426

Anonymous ID: acc791 July 18, 2025, 10:13 a.m. No.23344238   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4786

Mark Halperin Reveals That a Blockbuster Trump-Epstein Exposé Is About to Drop

Isaac SchorrJul 17th, 2025, 12:39 pm

 

Veteran political journalist Mark Halperin revealed on Thursday that “everyone” believes a blockbuster exposé about the relationship between President Donald Trump and the late sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein is about to drop.

 

“One of the points of this platform, in the age of transparency, is to narrow the gap between elites like Dan [Turrentine], and Sean [Spicer], and the people like the 2WAY community and myself. So let me share something with you that “everyone,” I say that in air quotes, everyone I know knows hasn’t been publicly reported. Everyone I know believes a major newspaper, one of the top three newspapers in the country, is about to publish a piece about President Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Okay? Everyone I know knows that. And people in the White House know that, too. When that story drops, if it drops today, and some people think it might, it could drive the day,” began Halperin before asking Turrentine and Spicer if they had heard about the story.

 

“Well, I know because it’s been circulating on the Left, and I’ve had to double-check that this is not in fact, you know, total conspiracy theories. Donald Trump knew Jeffrey Epstein pretty well, and I believe that his early courting of Melania [Trump] involved Jeffrey Epstein, and that has been reported by mainstream outlets over the last 10 years. Alleged, I guess, I want to be careful,” replied Turrentine.

 

“You’ve already been, I say with respect, somewhat careless,” observed Halperin, who insisted that the upcoming story would have “new news.”

 

Halperin went on to list a number of questions that might be answered by the story, which included:

 

How did Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein meet? Did Donald Trump ever go to Jeffrey Epstein’s townhouse? How many times? What occasions? One-on-one? Parties? What did he go for? How often did Jeffrey Epstein go to Mar-a-Lago? How often did Donald Trump go to Jeffrey Epstein’s Palm Beach residence? Where else, besides the townhouse and the two Palm Beach properties, did they ever spend time together? Did they have any financial dealings?

 

“In the search for explanations about the president attacking his base in a way he’s never done, some people are pointing to his awareness of this story that’s supposedly coming soon,” concluded Halperin. “That’s what I’ll tell here.”

 

Watch above via 2WAY on YouTube.

 

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/mark-halperin-reveals-that-a-blockbuster-trump-epstein-expose-is-about-to-drop/?cfp