>>2334755 (lb)
It says non armed, not non nuclear. That just means the MIRVs were dummies.
>D5 missile being 44.5’ in length, I >measured the amount of pixels in the >launch pic of the “missile”. I measured 12 >pixels.
Good work anon, I'll just add that if the camera has a rolling shutter the missile could look shorter than reality. The base will have moved a bit by the time its exposed. Maybe only a pixel though…
You need error bars. :)
The exposure looks quite long though. Along the shore toward the middle right are two light tracks, presumably boats that have identical wiggle tracks, and if they're boats they can't be going that fast.
Please post the title of the video. I'm phone fagging and if I click on a YouTube link it opens up YouTube, logged in as me. Not v cool
Last time I did that I got a video with 1 view. So it wouldn't be too hard for bad actors to work out who is in /QR/
Yeah, it's just not logical to try and hit a fast moving plane with a ballistic missile. You tend to use radar, heat, laser paint, or machine vision guidance for a bit of fine tuning toward the end. They're different animals for different purposes.
Besides it has already been established that AF1 was not in the vicinity.
Yes, yes they are.
I don't think you understand what ballistic means.
I don't see any point trying to grasp at facts to show AF1 was the target, the fact that a nuclear ballistic missile got launched is remarkable, and scary, enough.
Also, if it was a test launch we wouldn't be taking about it now because it was Q that brought it up.
But hey, believe what you want. I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. And I've been known to be wrong in the past about a great many things.
Anon, it's the other anon I'm responding to who seems to have a thing for AF1 being the target. I'm pointing out how illogical that is, being a ballistic missile and all.
KEK, I thought you were talking about Al.
No worries anon, I wondered about that. Wish I'd had that ID, might have saved me a few minutes of my life kek.
Any anons here remember an old DOS program that taught Esperanto? I'm asking because it had some, what I considered to be freaky and fringe at the time, NWO info in it. Seems pretty relevant today though….
Would have been from the early-mid nineties, I just can't rememer what it was called.
Ty anon. I'll have a look too, but I don't think it was specifically to do with Esperanto, that was just part of being prepared after the war… It was a file I downloaded from a BBS, and it was like oneword.zip (but oneword was another word :))
I probably have a copy of it somewhere, but would be like looking for a needle in a haystack.
No, unfortunately I didn't.
It was definitely DOS. Had a text menu system, quite a bit was about the NWO plan, some was about Esperanto.
It's bugging me now. Kek
No it was not a game, no game elements. It was really bizarre. Like I said, text menu system. Hard to explain. Some ASCII graphics screens, colour. Someone put a lot of work in to it.
Probably no sound, or maybe PC speaker. No media, it was downloaded. I don't think it came from any production house. I downloaded it mid-90s but I think it may have been older than that, maybe late 80s.
Some of the ASCII art featured Russian (USSR) assault helicopters. That's all I remember of the art. It was telling a story roughly along the lines of NWO wants to take over and you need to be prepared. They'll start a nuclear war and you should be able to paroli Esperanto (looked that up) in order to communicate with amiko.
It was a zip file, with an 8.3 filename. Pretty sure the 8 was a complete word, maybe an Esperanto word, but not sure on that.
It was started from DOS (that's all I used at the time) and it did a bit of an intro in text, then to a text menu with lots of options, lots of sub menus, etc.
I can't remember much more about it unfortunately, I didn't take it too seriously at the time and probably jumped back in to red storm rising, gunship 2000 or f-15 strike eagle as I seemed to enjoy blowing up bad guys at that time…
No, sorry. Like I say, I don't think it was specifically to do with Esperanto, that was just a sub part of it.
I'll be looking through old hard drives this week I think, but I think it goes back further than I would have managed to keep hold of.
If I do find it, or remember what it was called I'll post back, using the phrase mistero esperanto, and I'll reply to a fresh Q post of there's one handy, that should get noticed kek.