>>23350293

tyb

in the u.k there has been a breaking story about thousands of afghans being flowing into the u.k without telling the british people and putting a super injunction on the media to report it, the media would have gone along with it happily. This has been going on for two years and probably between 18k to 100k or could be moar.

The excuse given is that the afghan intruptors and their families due to being a mod leak where someone sent a email and leaked all their details.

Anon thinks this is a load a bollocks.

if that was the case they would not have been able to survive being hunted down by the afghans.

anon thinks the people that were flown over were the ones that the pakistani kicked out of their country, who were criminals and cos they had nowhere to go as the afghans would have killed them, they flew them to the u.k and put thim into communities.

btw it was also the reason why rishi sunack called a early election and starmer was installed.

o7

>>23350732

DEPORTED AFGHANS FROM PAKISTAN FLOWN TO U.K - ANON OPINE

Note: see anons opine >>23350732

linked below the bbc and u.k deep state narrative.

Thousands of Afghans were moved to UK in secret scheme after data breach

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvg8zy78787o

–

Joel Gunter & Sean Seddon

BBC News

Published

15 July 2025

Updated 16 July 2025

Thousands of Afghans have moved to the UK under a secret scheme which was set up after a British official inadvertently leaked their data, it can be revealed.

In February 2022, the personal details of nearly 19,000 people who had applied to move to the UK after the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan were leaked.

The previous government learned of the breach in August 2023 when some of the details appeared on Facebook.

A new resettlement scheme for those on the leaked list was set up nine months later, and has seen 4,500 Afghans arrive in the UK so far.

But the existence of the leak and relocations were kept secret after the government obtained a super-injunction stopping it from becoming public.

Details of the major data breach, the response and the number of Afghans granted the right to live in the UK as a result only came to light on Tuesday after a High Court judge ruled, external the gagging order should be lifted.

The leak contained the names, contact details and some family information of people potentially at risk of harm from the Taliban.

Downing Street would not confirm whether the official responsible for the leak had faced disciplinary action, with a spokesman saying they would not comment on individuals.

The government also revealed on Tuesday:

The MoD believes 600 Afghan soldiers included in the leak, plus 1,800 of their family members, are still in Afghanistan

The scheme is being closed down, but relocation offers already made to those who remain in Afghanistan will be honoured

The secret scheme - officially called the Afghan Relocation Route - has cost £400m so far, and is expected to cost a further £400m to £450m

The breach was committed mistakenly by an unnamed official at the MoD

People whose details were leaked were only informed on Tuesday

Speaking in the House of Commons, Defence Secretary John Healey offered a "sincere apology" to those whose details had been included in the leak, which came to light when some appeared on Facebook.

He said it was as a result of a spreadsheet being emailed "outside of authorised government systems", which he described as a "serious departmental error" - though the Metropolitan Police decided a police investigation was not necessary.

Healey said the leak was "one of many data losses" related to the Afghanistan evacuation during that period, and contained the names of senior military officials, government officials and MPs.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch apologised on behalf of her party.

She told LBC: "Somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that. That should not happen."

In a 2024 High Court judgement made public on Tuesday, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was "quite possible" that some of those who saw parts of the leaked document in a Facebook group "were Taliban infiltrators or spoke about it to Taliban-aligned individuals".

It had earlier been feared the number of people at "risk of death or serious harm" because they appeared on the list, or because their family member did, could be as high as 100,000.

However, a review of the incident carried out on behalf of the MoD found it was "highly unlikely" an individual would have been targeted solely because of the leaked data, which "may not have spread nearly as widely as initially feared".

continued

>>23350732

>>23350815

The MoD has declined to say how many people may have been arrested or killed as a result of the data breach.

The same review judged the secret scheme to be an "extremely significant intervention" given the "potentially limited" risk posed by the leak.

An email has been sent to those impacted by the breach, urging them to "exercise caution", and take steps like protecting their online activities and not responding to messages from unknown contacts.

Healey said those who have been relocated to the UK have already been counted in immigration figures.

'Unprecedented'

Tuesday's disclosure dates back to the August 2021 withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, which saw the Taliban retake power and quickly surround the capital Kabul.

The leak involved the names of people who had applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme, which the UK government set up to rapidly process applications by people who feared reprisals from the Taliban and move them to the UK.

The evacuation - which saw 36,000 Afghans moved to the UK - has already been heavily criticised in the years since it was launched, with a 2022 inquiry by the Foreign Affairs Committee finding it was a "disaster" and a "betrayal".

When the government set up a new relocation scheme last year in response to the leak, members of the press quickly learned about the plans.

The government asked a judge to impose an injunction on the media. The court then imposed a type of order which prevented outlets from reporting any detail of the leak, or even that the injunction itself existed. Healey said he was not aware of any other similar injunctions being in place.

He told the House even he had been prevented from speaking about the breach because of the "unprecedented" injunction, after being informed while still shadow defence secretary.

Reading a summary of his judgment in court, Mr Justice Chamberlain said the gagging order had "given rise to serious free speech concerns".

He continued: "The super-injunction had the effect of completely shutting down the ordinary mechanisms of accountability which operate in a democracy.

"This led to what I describe as a 'scrutiny vacuum'."

Court documents disclosed on Tuesday revealed then-Defence Secretary Ben Wallace "personally" applied for the stringent injunction in order to give the government time to do "everything it reasonably can to help those who might have been put at further risk by the data compromise".

The injunction was extended in November 2023 on the basis the Taliban may not have been aware of the leaked data's existence.

However, Mr Justice Chamberlain decided to lift it on the ground the MoD's internal review found the Taliban "likely already possess the key information in the dataset" and confirmation of its existence was "unlikely" to "substantially" raise the risk" faced by those impacted.

Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge, who was in government when the secret scheme was established, said "this data leak should never have happened and was an unacceptable breach of all relevant data protocols".

Erin Alcock, a lawyer for the firm Leigh Day, which has assisted hundreds of Arap applicants and family members, called the breach a "catastrophic failure".

Earlier this month, the government confirmed it had offered payouts to Afghans whose information had been compromised in a separate data breach.

END

>>23350732, >>23350815, >>23350818 Thousands of Afghans were moved to UK in secret scheme after data breach - bbc source and anon opine.

>>23350626

this guy is a massive faggot and puts this type of crap out to get clicks.

he is the same as sam wooton who got fired from gbnews and was a massive faggot.

truth and lies to confuse the issue.

Think this faggot is called walker.

>>23350848

>>23350866

his opine sounds like a lot of crap.

the taliban would have shot them.

anon still thinks they are those that got kicked out of pakistan when the deported most of their criminals, some were afghans most were pakistanis who were fighting against the taliban and had moved to pakistan.

lets see how it plays out.