TYB
Use true and false values, P does not imply R.
When P is false and Q is true then R is false
P implies Q is true, Q implies R is false, P implies R is true
So (P implies Q and Q implies R) is false
(P implies Q and Q implies R) =(P implies R) is true
(P implies Q and Q implies R) <=(P implies R) is false
And I failed CS272, dude. Not because I couldn't do it, but because I skipped so many classes and the final the prof had no choice but to.
Meh, it's been a long time since I've done any Boolean algebra. Assumptions can be true, but they can also be false, both with implication.
If I assume that you're a sub-70 IQ anon, and I'm not saying you are, I'm just saying for the sake of argument. Dos that mean my assumption based upon deduction is true? See what I'm saying?
Never seen anyone claim that an incorrect assumption based upon flawed deduction is true. Because that's the fault in his logic, that the assumption and the deduction can't be adulterated.
Asshole got me thinking.
Let p equal a flawed assumption, which in reality is actually something false.
Let q equal a flawed deduction based upon that flawed deduction, it's answer also false due to the false assumption.
"therefore" q "upside down V" r "does not imply" big T.
>r
q
Fuck
I mean, you can "exclusive or" two false values to get a true, but your can't "and" them.
KEK. But I'm probably wrong, who cares? I sure as fuck don't.
Nobody is trying to kill you, SmartDust. You're not important enough to.
It's going to be an awkward oh-seven when he gets back after my behavior since they went quiet.
Yeah, because they're the problem, not you, right?
Yeah, probably. Been a while since I've done any Boolean Algebra, like I said, like 26 fuckin' years, so I may be a little rusty.
CompSci dropout. The most code I've written in the past 10 years are Bash for loops to iterate over files.
Just don't have the drive for it anymore. I was the kid in school that was computer nerd, got to high school and I was all cocky when learning Basic came around, told the teacher I'm dropping the class and when he asked why, I told him I already knew it. KEK. So, he's like, "Okay, it's never been done here before but let me check with the principal before you drop out, you did so well last year." So I come back the next day and he's like, "Alright, we'll put ahead a grade, but seeing as you already know everything you need to about Basic, write the final and if you get 95% or higher, we'll let let you go into the senior class learning Pascal, a 5 credit course, but you only have to show up for the 3 credit course you're currently in, so 3 days a week rather than 5. So I write it and got a 96 and I was the first person at my high school to be put ahead a grade in computers, probably not anymore though, that happened in '91. The school board hired me when I was 12, maybe 13, I can't remember which grade it was, to come in and teach teachers at a teacher convention on the operation of Locksmith and Copy II+ on the Apple II, and their biggest complaint was that I went over the material too fast. Thought when I was a kid that my career would be something to do with computers, that never happened.
KEK. Kind of the opposite for me, English classes were the ones I struggled in, and it's my first damn language. Got better grades in other language classes, French and German, than I ever did in English. Kind of why I was so hyped on learning languages in high school, the one teacher I had kept going on about how I was the 2nd best student he ever taught. The first being an older kid who'd read the German novels the teacher imported.
She's not a stooge, she's a foil so the rest of the table doesn't come off as an echo chamber.
It'll be a long time before gravity affects those. It's why I like B-cups.
I can say I know a fair bit of those too. Not expertly, except maybe Basic. Let's see: Basic, Pascal, Forth, Common Lisp, Assembler (6502/680x0/Intel/ARM/Pic), C, Java, and a small handful of others but those are the big ones. Never did understand why people find C pointers difficult, it's just like loading an address into the zero page on a 6502 and indirectly addressing the location with that.
I'm not sure I'm on board with that. Compare a 30-year-old woman on the African Savannah that's never wore a shirt or a bra to a 30-year-old woman in North America that's wore shirts and bras. There's a distinct difference in shape and sag that could be attributed to bra usage.
>Toughest system I ever did had me working in three or four different languages at the same time
Yeah, that'll really stress the stack on a foreign function interface.
Didn't it have something to do with her pupil being oddly shaped? Can't remember the name for the condition, but I seem to remember something discussed here in the early days about how that's something special that the predators look for in their victims.
Yeah, that's pretty much what the mimic is. How I meme and what I say is his "Precious" that he obsesses over.
>Millennials have an abundance mindset, knowing you can get anything to your frontdoor in a couple of hours
I'd say that's more an entitlement mindset, thinking that the deliveries will never be interrupted. They wouldn't know what to do if the internet went down for a day, and would be completely lost if the internet went down for a week. Boomers wouldn't give a fuck and keep continuing on, one post. Anyway, I'm done with your communist division narrative now. The filter's that way.
Nice to know you can be civil, eBot. It's odd how the conversation with that anon ended because he had to go and then your bullshit starts up again.
Going to imitate how I meme again? How original. Go indulge your one-track simplistic and narrow-minded performance in the filter.
Deep state losers so good at their job they have to imitate a shitposter.
KEK. It's not the meme that people listen to. But you keep holding someone else's Dumbo feather, thinking that's what made him fly.
I mean, the toxic copycat tactic may have worked on half, but in this small backwater it was destined to fail.
And you know, if some BV wouldn't have slapped the back of my head a couple times in the mornings a year ago, the toxic copycat strategy probably would have been successful. Now it's just a loophole that the MuhJoos use to spam the object of their hate without having it deleted, only instead of projecting accusations of degenerate behavior onto a religious group that ignores them, they actually use that degenerate behavior on an individual on this board that laughs in their general direction.
Well post count is getting a wee bit high as this bread's been kind of slow and I burned about 10 posts talking about computer stuff, so I think I'll get back to the audiobook. Currently on the second book of Samuel.
Until you don't. That'll hit you like a ton of bricks if you grew up with participation trophies and never being told no. Enjoy, it's coming soon.