dChan
Anonymous ID: 86208c July 29, 2018, 3:04 a.m. No.2335934   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5939 >>5968

>>2335882

 

>>2309749 pb

Hey P&L, what gives?

> A few nights ago, Clam had a rough night.

You said this once b4, and I replied I didn’t have a rough night. Yes, you gave me a hard time in the morning bc you thought I was a shill, but I told you no worries, mistakes happen.

>>2290828 pb

>............No worries, it’s human nature to protect what we care about.

>we all have bad nights

>………Actually, was one of the best nights of my life, kek–that Fed Q drop… man oh man.

>Out of character

>………Rly? Okay, kek.

But you made it sound as though I’d just abandoned baking bc butthurt, when you also knew I’d checked in the next night after my last bake, as usual, and prearranged a couple days off with NB bc tired.

>> 2293031 pb

Also, this claim

> Others have continued to comment & make digs at Clam.

isn't true as far as I can see. It was only shills. Very obviously shilling. I’m sure you didn’t mean to put out false information about me, but even well-meaning errors can cause unnecessary confusion, which is why I prefer others not speak for me. As you know, there is a heavy campaign to discredit bakers and spread mistrust on the board. Safest way not to fan those flames is just to let one another’s work/words speak for themselves.

Thanks for your understanding P&L, I know you work hard for the cause.

Anonymous ID: 86208c July 29, 2018, 3:27 a.m. No.2336009   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2335968

>There were real anons that had a problem with your power-tripping

>You did not interact and act respectful for requests from numerous anons for specific notables, called us shills and were rude as hell.

Can you provide links or caps plz?

>Even the BV got involved because of the complaints

Yes, when BV is called to do a hash check bc suspected shill, BV does that, even when the anons calling for it are themselves suspected as being shills. Happens all the time. BV doing a hash check is not an indicator of wrong-doing. BV confirmed my hash, said baker was not a shill. BV also addressed the complaints saying something like "we don't remove notables just bc they displease JIDF." At no time did BV corroborate any claims I was rude or acting in bad faith.

>I hope you realize doing your baker work does not entitle you to power-trip others.

I honestly don't understand where this is coming from. Again, can you plz provide links or caps to support this claim? Even anons at the time of blow-up (and during the night's bake) were calling out the shills doing the complaining. I think you're mistaking shills for real anons. Which is understandable when they tag-team.

You are making serious accusations impugning my character here baker. Plz consider how that will affect your own reputation. If you can't back these accusations up with evidence, it just comes off as inter-office politicking. That kind of thing has no place here. We're here to work.

 

I don't want to slide the board with an argument, I just wanted to respond to false accusations with conflicting evidence. I don't want to argue, I just respectfully ask that you neither speak for me, or make accusations you can't sauce. TY, have a good night.