Q: Why do "Trump" hating district and Judges always seem to get the most important cases?
A(nonOpine): To show the public, to set precedence of being overruled by higher courts, to "enshrine" a cleansing/neutering of the corruption within the judiciary, and to safeguard future generations by providing a common sense, FREE nation.
Q: Why did Q+ post "The world's best explanation of bitcoin" ?
A(nonOpine): Signal to the last side of the pyramid, humanity has fought back and won the (public debate) on PUBLIC decentralized blockchain FinTech, not ("pRiVaTe") single point of failure unconstutional "Acts" invoking a Godelian inconsistency of what is ultimately the entity having a DEPENDENCY on the very same public that it is also declaring itself as INDEPENDENT FROM THAT SAME DEPENDENCY!
And attempted to be coded as a private monopoly debtor of the medium of exchange of the whole population.
Imagine someone, anyone, architecting their own system to have a logical systems dependency on your system. In order for this system to function, your time/energy are needed to provide it with the services it receives by way of that dependency.
Now imagine it architcted its public API service with you and the public, of it declating itself indendent from your system, while it also demands you provide it with unlimited/arbitrary POST requests on your system, and, unlimited/arbitrary GET requests of your system, and, unlimited arbitrary PATCH/PUT requests to CHANGE the data on your system, and finally, and here is the kicker, what it requirees of your system, now imagine what it is offering as its service….
It is not only different, it is indeed the opposite! You are not permitted to send requests as you see fit, you are not entitled unlimited/arbitrary post/get/patch/put requests, you would be sent a legal threat, DEBANKING, of your entire infrastructure if you tried to act in way way towards more independence from the thing declaring itself independent from you, if you in any way acted reciprocality with that inconsistent system, or, sought FinTech independence from that system, and if they threated you and you tried to counter sue them, the entire public court system is indrectly also supported by their system, hardware-wise, but you and the public are responsible for funding that very same inconsistent "non government but government funded" inconsistent system
Would you think that is the BEST pattern that must bind the entire public, that it be told its biological and hardware systems must willingly interface with such a blatant, outrageous, obscene, total disaster API?
And then anyone who points out the only way such a large scale blatantly inconsistent system could have arisen at all and lasted as ling as it did, must mathematically by probability been implemented through shielding the true code from the sams public, through fake media blackouts, attacks on those who so much as question the inconsistent system, and behind the scenes in a quiet war, through subterfuge, deceit, blackmail, bribery, through, in other words, necessarily coordinated, highly intelligent, highly funded, conspiracy?
Intelligence of human beings created the most inconsistent public pattern of biological and social political economy ever in human history.
When you SEE a bug, an inconsistency, you ask how it got there. Most of the time, it's well intended human error, and then you fix. But if you dont see the bug, you can't correct it, even when you're looking at the source code that contains the bug.
Things really can be "hidden in plain sight".
Now look to the same question.
Would you think that is the BEST pattern that must bind the entire public, that it be told its biological and hardware systems must willingly interface with such a blatant, outrageous, obscene, total disaster API that formed by criminal conspiracy, and was somehow able to get an "Act" signed into law (after the opposition was sunk to the bottom of the Atlantic)?
All it will take to 'end the Fed' is for the truth of its full history be made public.