Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 7:35 p.m. No.23361097   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1121 >>1391

Domestic enemy responding to a call about a white man with a firearm holds innocent black man at gunpoint, forcing him down on his knees, and claims he can do anything he wants for his safety.

 

They're domestic terrorists terrorizing innocent people and using their own cowardice to "justify" it. So much for land of the free and home of the brave huh?

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 8:08 p.m. No.23361237   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1251

Domestic enemies believe "ordinance" trumps constitution, claims a sign is not free speech. WRONG.

 

Constitutionally protected activity in a traditional public forumโ€ฆ and they're totally fucking clueless about the actual law and rights WE THE PEOPLE PAY THEM TO ENFORCE AND PROTECT.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 8:15 p.m. No.23361263   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23361251

Of course, they don't want them upholding our rights, they want blind idiot order followers too stupid to understand rights. They want cops who will demand ID even when it's not lawfully required because they'd rather gather data and pay those who sue with the peoples money.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 8:30 p.m. No.23361307   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Domestic enemies claim "we don't allow you to exercise your right here" in a traditional public forum, think you need a permit to engage in a constitutionally protected activity, and after being warned they still threaten to arrest for constitutionally protected activity in a traditional public forum.

 

They are domestic enemies violating and chilling constitutionally protected rights every day across this nation.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 8:41 p.m. No.23361326   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Domestic enemy "I'm not worried about this first amendment bullshit" as he blatantly deprives rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States under Color of Lawโ€ฆ.

 

So why was he never charged? So much for that constitution and law right?

 

Yeah land of the free and home of the brave! Where the people are forced under threat of violence and/or loss of liberty to pay domestic enemies to violate their rights and claim they're justified in doing so because of their cowardice!!!

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 8:54 p.m. No.23361373   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1385

>>23361341

>Why do they only play old and tired videos?

 

Video from 2 weeks ago, highlighting story from one year ago. On July 31, 2024, Kentucky State Domestic Enemy Trooper Myron Jackson took exception to Christen Johnson, a dental assistant and mom of 3 young children, silently filming his illegal traffic stop from her front porch. Trooper Jackson stormed up to Christen and threatened her, โ€œGo inside of the house or I will take you from your kids and take you to jail.โ€ When Christen remained filming on her porch, Trooper Jackson grabbed her, forcefully pulled her from her porch, and dragged her across the ground. Christenโ€™s two, seven, and ten-year-old children screamed and cried, watching helplessly as their mother was violently hand- cuffed and dragged away to jail. When she got out of jail the next day, she was forced to walk several miles home, and when she got there, she found her children gone.

 

Do you think the cops been charged yet?

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 8:57 p.m. No.23361385   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23361341

>>23361373

>Domestic Enemy Trooper Myron Jackson

 

This video is from 3 days ago, highlighting THE SAME DOMESTIC ENEMY==

 

"A little over two weeks ago, I posted a video showing Kentucky State Police Trooper Myron Jackson wrongfully arresting a mom of three who was on her own porch, filming Trooper Jackson's illegal traffic stop. The bogus criminal charge against the mom was dropped by prosecutors and a lawsuit was filed. Now yet another lawsuit has been filed against Trooper Jackson - this time for the wrongful arrest of an innocent Door Dash driver. I have the exclusive first look at the lawsuit and the bodycam footage. Just like the prior video, prosecutors dropped the bogus criminal charge. But looking a little deeper into the Kentucky State Police, it's no huge mystery where Jackson learned to make these sorts of unconstitutional arrests."

 

He got charged for this one right? Right? Surely cops aren't above the law!!!

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:05 p.m. No.23361417   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1485

>>23361391

You think I care about notables? KMAO

 

It's not some bad apples, it's the orchard itself that is rotten and on fire. They're not "good" cops, they're ALL complicit in the violation of rights and propping up that lawless "beast".

 

The constitution is VERY easy to understand. Government is forbidden from infringing certain unalienable rights. Government does not get to decide government can violate the limits we the people placed on government because it serves government interest.

 

EVERY SINGLE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN THE UNITED STATES is part of that. There are "good" people that are cops and didn't know, there is no "good cop". This nation MUST admit that LE and the courts ran off the cliff.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:10 p.m. No.23361435   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1582

>>23361400

 

Oh so we should have laid down arms and let the redcoats take us over because they would also, perhaps, arrest some pedos while they prop up the chain of command covering for other pedos?

 

I didn't say all cops are bastards, I've said repeatedly they have a Father, and a Father disciplines one He loves.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:31 p.m. No.23361495   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1501 >>1518

>>23361479

Because the legality of the stop is up for debate, he has rights, and the officer should have given a reason to exit the vehicle but most don't understand Penn v Mimms.

 

The "follow the Penn" but don't understand it.

 

Now, ignoring ALL of thatโ€ฆ so he didn't obey? Big deal. Cops violate laws and don't obey every day, I guess you're good with them being assaulted too right?

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:36 p.m. No.23361515   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1519

>>23361501

What did who do? The domestic enemies?

 

Cops pulled him over because he didn't have his headlights on, while not required to under the ACTUAL STATUTE, then when he lawfully verbally opposed and challenged their actions, not even in a rude or aggressive way, they demanded he exit the vehicle, not because they reasonable believed he was armed and wanted to do a pat down, and then attacked him for not obeying their unlawful order in an unlawful traffic stop.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:39 p.m. No.23361525   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1531 >>1535

>>23361518

Absolutely not. We are under no lawful obligation to follow unlawful orders, comply in an unlawful police actionโ€ฆ and we have the right to verbally oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest, according to the US Supreme Court. Furthermore, we have the RIGHT to use force to resist an unlawful arrest.

 

They're not Gods, they're servants, and they're BENEATH our rights, not above.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:49 p.m. No.23361558   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1569

>>23361550

Wrong. We have the RIGHT to verbally oppose and challenge police action without thereby risking arrest, and we have the RIGHT to use force to resist an unlawful arrest. It's our RIGHTS and you recommend people comply with lawlessness, give up their rights, and fight it in a corrupt court violating rights.

 

Kek what a moran

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:53 p.m. No.23361570   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1578

>>23361565

 

What part of

 

HERE WILL COME A TIME THEY WILL NOT BE SAFE WALKING DOWN THE STREET.

We will not be held hostage.

 

do you not understand? We the People have the RIGHT to STAND, even to the horror of those watching. It is biblical after all.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 9:56 p.m. No.23361579   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1586 >>1588

>>23361569

Wrong. We do have that right, you agree to hand over your license when LAWFULLY REQUESTED. When unlawfully stopped/detained, it is an unlawful request. This has been upheld many times in court, and the failure to produce license charge literally CAN NOT STAND in an unlawful stop.

 

No, again, WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT to verbally oppose and challenge police action without thereby risking arrest, which is a priciple charachteristic from which we determine a free nation from a police stateโ€ฆ. according to the US Supreme Court. We are under no lawful obligation to obey an unlawful order, and we have an unalienable right to use force to defend ourselves from unlawful arrest.

 

Your feelings don't mean shit to our rights. The people have laid dead in the square but it's time to STAND.

Anonymous ID: a17833 July 21, 2025, 10:03 p.m. No.23361601   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23361586

>>23361586

>>RIGHT to verbally oppose

>sure I'll give you that

>>challenge police action

>yea sure, in court

 

WRONG again! You're literally arguing against US Supreme Court precedent, these are well established rights. As the court said in the 8-1 majority opinion in City of Houston v Hill, "freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.โ€

 

Guess what we live in if people don't have that right.