Anonymous ID: 1a8f68 July 29, 2018, 8:05 a.m. No.2337431   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7482 >>7526 >>7926

SPOOFING ISOTOPIC SIGNATURES ON NUCLEAR FALSE FLAGS?

Couple of days ago, Anons were considering if Rosatom is selling uranium back to US nuclear energy company Exelon, which if true would create the possibility of pic related.

There were not any comments from anons although I posted this concept twice. 3rd post is a charm? Then it goes into the dustbin of historyโ€ฆ?

Anonymous ID: 1a8f68 July 29, 2018, 8:29 a.m. No.2337618   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2337593

>>2337505

>>2337513

The EAM and Skyking messages are code. Nobody knows what they mean unless they have the code book. They are secret military comms. The actual text they choose for the code has no significance whatsoever except for being recognizable in radio transmissions and being in the code book. You should not read anything into it other than that a message has been transmitted, at a certain time, and how that compares with other dates/times that messages have been transmitted. You can't read anything more into it than that.

We read that the SKYKING messages are addressed specifically to US nuclear forces, whereas the EAM non-skyking messages are to all US military forces.

R7, over.