dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Absolutely Not – Senators Graham and Cornyn Ask DOJ to Appoint Special Counsel to Investigate President Obama and Intelligence Weaponization Against Trump

July 24, 2025 | Sundance1/2

~Understanding Silos 101~

Senator Lindsey Graham (Judiciary Committee) and Senator John Cornyn (SSCI) are requesting Attorney General Pam Bondi to appoint a special counsel to look into the Obama administration’s weaponization of the U.S. Intelligence Community to target Donald Trump with fabricated smears and false evidence using a fraudulent Russia connection.

This should be an immediate hard no for a few reasons. Number one, the special counsel process is where investigations go to die intentionally as a design of the legislative branch defense process. =Second, the special counsel would not have cross-silo access== to exfiltrate information unless it was accompanied by very specific Presidential authority. It just will not work.

[SOURCE]

The intelligence community information that exposes the plot will be found in very distinct ‘silos’, essentially the intelligence agencies that house the information. Additionally, inside each of the silos there is a formal and informal process to designate that information based on its internally defined national security value.

An example of silo retention can be found in the issue of the FBI housing information in “prohibited access” files. These files are not even discoverable by most internal search efforts.

Within the Sentinel system there are “Restricted Access” files that are used to control who can view the file information (sources and methods etc.). The FBI or investigative official (think authorized special counsel) can see the filebut cannot access the information within it without a higher clearance level. In these files the Special Counsel can request access and then review. However, recently people discovered there are “Prohibited Access” files that makes the file invisible to both outside and inside searches or queries and are exclusively controlled by the FBI Director and FBI Deputy Director.

This is an example of a sub-silo (secret file keeping) within a distinct silo (FBI, Sentinel system).A special counsel would never discover the “prohibited” files, because there’s no way from outside the system to find it.

It’s a little complicated but DNI Tulsi Gabbard has been finding, declassifying and releasing these ‘prohibited access’ types of information, because as Director of National Intelligence -her clearance and position- allow her to gain full administrative level access to the entire metadata of IC information.

Tulsi can essentially log into all of the 18 intelligence agencies and review everything in the data storage system.A special counsel, regardless of authority, cannot do this. President Trump can demand full administrative access for himself and so can DNI Tulsi Gabbard. The rest of the silo administrators can only see the information inside their silo.

This limited access issue is how the intelligence agencies hide information. They rely on the inability of external reviewers to see the full scope and then cross reference to all other silos using the same terminology, data points and search sequences.

EXAMPLE – Making up an operational name like “Zero Footprint“, when DNI Tulsi Gabbard is looking at that operation, she can see the full scope of information related to Zero Footprint as the information goes from the White House (finding memo) to the CIA, to the State Dept, to the Pentagon, to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), possibly to the Joint Chiefs and then beyond to international partners (whole or part information shared).DNI Gabbard can see the entire continuum, cross reference each step in the process, see who handled the organization, communication, logistics, assignments and track each process, which enables her to map the inputs and outcomes along with the timeline.She can even see the briefings (or lack therein) to the Gang of Eight or PDB as they are recorded.

A special counsel has nowhere near this capacity.

https://youtu.be/eRHRJEsdm6I

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/07/24/absolutely-not-senators-graham-and-cornyn-ask-doj-to-appoint-special-counsel-to-investigate-president-obama-and-intelligence-weaponization-against-trump/

>>23378046

2/2

In the example above, the research required to find, extract, cross-reference, organize and then assemble the totality of all information related to such a large intelligence operation(fyi, Zero Footprint was real), takes a lot of time and effort. Tulsi Gabbard is able to designate very specific aides to assist in this process, but the demand on her time is extreme even with help.

DNI Gabbard recently told Fox News (video below) she was/is using AI as a tool to do autonomous spider crawls through the various silos looking for information that pertained to specific points, phrases, times, dates and people within the 18-agency silo system. Hundreds of thousands of “return positive” files must then be sifted and reviewed for connection to the participants,and again timelines become the key.This is a big shift in the use of AI data search engine capability within the national security information space;however, it is exactly what I have been talking about for the past several years as I traveled back and forth to DC.

=Now, keep in mind what I am describing above is “non-public” information. If you want to really understand the insanity of how the silos operate, you need to accept the same filing and hiding system exists even within public information==. The congressional staff don’t even know what the other congressional staff are doing with information from within two different committees, like the Senate Judiciary Committee (FISC oversight) and the Senate Homeland Security Committee (DOJ-NSD), or Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (FBI – Cointel).

In essence, there is little to no information sharing within the silo process, even within the guys on the “same team,” and making matters worse sometimes a research team can gain information that is much more pertinent to the other guys looking at similar issues from within another silo. Discovering this is beyond frustrating; however, it does explain how independent researchers who share on open-source crowd sharing platforms can walk down a research trail much faster.

Bottom line, a Special Counsel is an exercise in futility, unless that special counsel has the same review and extraction capability as President Trump and/or DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

The best option is a team of investigators within Tulsi Gabbard’s office to continue the digging and connecting the information; then share the discoveries with DOJ officials. Previously, I said a small group within the National Security Council might also be able to deliver a similar outcome.

Lastly, a tip-line allowing the private sector crowdsourcing to push puzzle pieces toward the research team might also be a big help.(anons called up)

https://youtu.be/eRHRJEsdm6I

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/07/24/absolutely-not-senators-graham-and-cornyn-ask-doj-to-appoint-special-counsel-to-investigate-president-obama-and-intelligence-weaponization-against-trump/

(Special Counsel is a long drawn out matter with no particular conclusion and no justice, because they are not allowed to do so, just like Barr did with Durham. Graham and Cornyn agreed with the weaponized government because the SSCI on intelligence all worked in the structure to take Trump Out, they knew the exact plan to destroy and possibly take Trump out, they all hated him in the first term. So now they want a Special Counsel to cover up their treason. It’s pretty obvious and hopefully Thune is too afraid to do it again. Graham and Cornyn need to be voted out or exposed for their hideous corruption. But Tulsi and Trump know exactly who was involved.)

House to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell after motion from Knoxville Rep. Tim Burchett

Allie Feinberg

Rep. Tim Burchett, a Knoxville Republican, led the effort in a House subcommittee to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell July 22.

Burchett's July 22 effort is the latest in a series of moves to advocate for transparency while balancing support for the Trump administration.

The U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Reform is subpoenaing Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate of disgraced financer Jeffrey Epstein, thanks to a motion from U.S. Rep, Tim Burchett.

The Knoxville Republican on July 22 introduced a motion to force Maxwell to testify before Congress.It's the latest step in his efforts to demand the release of the Epstein investigative files.

“This deposition will help the American people understand how Jeffrey Epstein was able to carry out his evil actions for so long without being brought to justice,” Burchett said in a release.

Burchett had been critical of the U.S. Department of Justice since July 7, when the DOJ published a report saying Epstein did not have a sex trafficking client list and that he died by suicide. Less than two weeks later, in lockstep with other MAGA leaders who had been critical of the Trump administration's handling of information, Burchett changed his tone.

"(Attorney General Pam Bondi's communication) was not as good, the binder for instance," Burchett told ABC News July 20.He said there was room for Bondi to "turn a corner" and that he applauded the July 17 move by Bondi and President Donald Trump to ask courts to release grand jury testimony from Epstein's legal proceedings.

Burchett's push to subpoena Maxwell comes after rising tensions within the GOP over transparency. He pressed for the subpoena on the same day Justice Department officials announced they’d asked to meet with Maxwell.

Trump, who has discouraged questions about the Epstein investigation, told reporters at the White House July 22 that the request to interview Maxwell “sounds appropriate to do.”

Johnson cuts session short after legislation Burchett signed onto

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson is sending different signals about the investigation. The Louisiana Republican announced July 22 he was shutting down House operations early, sending lawmakers home even sooner ahead of a five-week summer recess.

Johnson's decision seemed to be in response to a July 15 bill Burchett cosponsored to force a vote on the complete release of the Epstein investigative files. Burchett also signed a petition from Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky (who introduced the legislation) that would expedite voting on the bill if enough House members sign on. If the petition gets 218 signatures, it bypasses the usual procedure and heads straight to the floor for a vote.

“We’re done being lectured on transparency,” Johnson said at a July 22 news conference. "We're not going to play political games with this."

In response, Burchett told Knox News through a spokesperson,"I ultimately answer to my creator."

https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/politics/2025/07/23/house-committee-to-subpoena-ghislaine-maxwell-jeffery-epstein-files-tim-burchett-motion/85323422007/

Anonymous ID: 0a387b July 24, 2025, 10:19 p.m. No.23378201 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>8217

‘I applaud’ Trump, Bondi for wanting to release Epstein grand jury files: Burchett

Jul 20

2025

ABC News’ Martha Raddatz interviews Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., on "This Week" about his thoughts concerning the potential release of the Jeffrey Epstein files.

6:48

https://youtu.be/zZQ7gDU1e2g

>>23378201 God really loves Burchett, a very honest man

Anonymous ID: 0a387b July 24, 2025, 10:34 p.m. No.23378230 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>8265

Gutfeld: This narrative that hasn’t aged well

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld and the panel discuss the ‘Russiagate’ investigation on ‘Gutfeld!’

https://youtu.be/NEvyGCimJA0

11:35

>>23378230 this was funny

This is funnier

'Gutfeld!': Here's Biden's bad book deal

Greg Gutfeld and the 'Gutfeld!' panel discuss former President Joe Biden's new book deal.

(“how many memoirs can his ghost writer write, if the ghost writer could write absolute bullshit again?” it’s like “how many chucks could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck, could chuck wood? But it doesn’t rhyme.