Anonymous ID: d5e4bf July 25, 2025, 11:23 a.m. No.23379974   🗄️.is 🔗kun

20 mins ago -Politics & Policy

Exclusive: Jake Sullivan encourages Trump team to buy munitions in bulk

 

Years of industrial complacency, including not putting "enough energy or emphasis on munitions," has painted the U.S. into a corner, former national security adviser Jake Sullivan told Axios.

 

Solving the problem, he said, requires a "generational project" spanning business interests and political affiliations.

 

Why it matters: Today's defense news cycle is dominated by questions of American manufacturing might. The conversation is set against a backdrop of competition with Russia and China (and their growing symbiosis).

• The sudden shipbuilding obsession, including President Trump's own preoccupation, is a symptom of this.

 

Driving the news: Sullivan spoke to Axios on the sidelines of the Reindustrialize conference in downtown Detroit, a city experiencing its own metropolitan rebirth.

• There's a pressing need, he said, "for the national security community — not just the economic policy community — in the United States to be focused on reconstituting our industrial base in critical sectors that are going to define the future."

• The status quo "was decades in the making," he added. "When I came in, I found just how weakened a state our defense-industrial base was in."

 

State of play: Reams of studies, white papers, op-eds and surveys detail the fragility of the defense-industrial base (DIB).

• Govini's National Security Scorecard, published this summer, warned that China's "relentless three-decade military modernization — with an estimated $236 billion expenditure in 2024 — and Russia's industrial surge capacity — quintupling artillery shell production since 2022 — starkly contrast with the U.S. DIB."

• The Ronald Reagan Institute's National Security Innovation Base Report Card, shared in March, cautioned that the U.S. "struggles to manufacture and field new national security tech" at speeds and scales that matter.

• And the Commission on the National Defense Strategy concluded last July that the Pentagon's "business practices, byzantine research and development and procurement systems, reliance on decades-old military hardware, and culture of risk avoidance" reflect a bygone era.

 

Yes, but: There's hope the ship can be righted. It will take time — meaning multiple administrations and, potentially, conflicts.

• Sullivan in conversation with Axios encouraged the Trump administration to pursue multiyear contracting for munitions.

• Such deals give defense contractors "the certainty to make the capital expenditures to build the factories, to supply the munitions, rather than make this a year-by-year thing."

• Multiyear munitions buys were also favored by the House China Committee.

 

What they're saying: "The more you challenge the industrial base, you build the muscle, and it's like a flywheel," Darin DiTommaso, a GE Aerospace vice president, told Axios at the conference.

• "You actually enhance the capability of the supply base by putting more challenge on them, as opposed to starting and stopping programs, because that's when you lose people, and you lose skill sets," he said.

• "It's really hard to restart a production line once you've stopped it."

 

By the numbers: The U.S. Air Force in 2024 inked a $3.2 billion multiyear contract with Lockheed Martin for Long Range Anti-Ship and Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff missiles. That same year, the Navy secured a bulk deal with HII for four amphibious warships, expected to save the service $1 billion.

 

The bottom line: "A country without robust manufacturing is hardly a country at all," Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, said in a Reindustrialize speech.

• "America, like any country, is not just a country of consumers that want cheap stuff. It's a country of producers."

 

https://archive.is/OVQJC

 

(Hey Jake, weren’t you the one under HRCs propaganda campaign on Trump, that Trump was a Russian Stooge? Based on that, no one is asking your opinion, Weren’t you were involved in having Ukraine escalate a war on Bidan and your watch. And you and your boss ruined the country by inviting millions of illegals)

Anonymous ID: d5e4bf July 25, 2025, 11:48 a.m. No.23380092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0164

Scott Adams: Obama's "Russia Hoax" And "Fine People Lie" Ruined My Life And Divided AmericaTim Hains On Date July 24, 2025

(I can’t download the shortened video on RCP)

 

"Dilbert" creator Scott Adams discusses the role the "Russia hoax" and the "fine people" lie divided America and "ruined his life" on his morning livestream.

 

SCOTT ADAMS: How many of you found out that Obama's hoaxes—which would include the Russia hoax, and it would also include the "fine people" hoax, because Obama was behind that and Biden running for office—those two hoaxes, I would argue, ruined my life.

 

Let me say that again.

 

Those two hoaxes—Russia, Russia, Russia, and the "fine people" hoax—ruined my life.

 

Because those are the hoaxes that allowed my entire social group to say, “Are you kidding me? You're backing Trump?Trump's a Russian puppet, and he said that neo-Nazis are fine people. So we can't even talk to you again. You're so bad that we can't invite you anywhere, we can't be your friend, and you should just f–k off.”

 

So this is very personal to me.

 

What Obama did was he divided the country with these hoaxes. Because if you imagine a different history—where there had never been a Russia hoax, and there had never been a “fine people” hoax—those were the two primary ways that people became anti-Trumpers. Like really serious ones, where the TDS comes in.

 

Now, I would also argue that it's possible that that's what ushered in all the woke stuff.It's what got me canceled.

 

So if you were to go back, trace the causes back to their origin, you would find out that Obama and Clinton and Brennan, etc.—and their hoaxes—ruined my life.

 

Now, I didn't realize that until today. Because my natural personality is not to complain about stuff. My natural personality is to say, “Oh, that happened. I guess I have to do this now.”

 

So I don't spend a ton of time whining about bad things that happen to me. I just sort of, you know, get moving to fix it and make the best of every situation.

 

But if you were to look at it objectively—those motherf–kers ruined my social life, and then my professional life. And it was entirely based on two hoaxes. So do I want them in jail? Yes. Yes, I want Obama in jail for ruining my life with what looks like criminal acts to me.

 

And, you know, I don't know if the “fine people” hoax was a criminal act, but it was definitely a conspiracy. They were all in on it. And they all knew the truth. And the news backed them up, so the news was, you know, part of the bad guys. If you said there's a way to make some of the news hosts get handcuffed and taken to jail, because they knew that they were supporting a lie—I'd be in favor of that.

 

I don't think there's any law that would support that. But if there were?Yeah, I think that some of the people who ruined my life—and maybe a lot of your lives—should go to jail. Absolutely.

 

I just don't think it's gonna happen.

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/07/24/scott_adams_obamas_russia_hoax_and_fine_people_lie_ruined_my_life_and_divided_america.html