ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗΜΕΜΕΣ ΒΑΝΙΛΙΑΣ ΣΟΓΙΑΣ ID: ee0821 July 27, 2025, 11:20 a.m. No.23390118   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Okay—if we assume a worst-case hypothetical where:

 

>>23390105

 

🧊 4. If He’s Convicted or Institutionalized

 

Once Baldwin is:

 

Incarcerated, or

 

Declared mentally unfit/addicted and nonfunctional,

child support obligations may be reduced or paused, but not wiped out.

 

His assets could still be garnished:

 

Houses

 

Royalties

 

Retirement accounts

 

Future income (e.g., from residuals, investments)

 

The wife could win full control of family assets under:

 

A restraining order

 

Trusts for the kids

 

Civil lawsuits on top of divorce

 

🧨 Legal Fallout & Narrative Spin

 

This scenario would likely evolve into:

 

A public legal disaster, with court-appointed guardians for children,

 

Possible criminal proceedings against Baldwin,

 

Tabloid/media firestorms,

 

Potential defamation suits from Baldwin if any of these allegations were false—but if they're true, he’s done.

 

🧾 Summary of Assumed Outcome:

Category Result

Prenup Voided due to threats, addiction, and extreme conduct

Custody Full to mother; Baldwin may lose parental rights

Child Support $50K–$100K+ / month

Spousal Support $100K–$200K+ / month

Legal Action Civil + criminal; possible asset seizure or trust fund

Public Impact Complete image collapse; potential jail time

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗΜΕΜΕΣ ΒΑΝΙΛΙΑΣ ΣΟΓΙΑΣ ID: ee0821 July 27, 2025, 11:23 a.m. No.23390131   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0133

⚓ Hypothetical: Person "Shot Out the Cannon by the Navy for Tribunals"

 

This implies:

 

Military jurisdiction

 

Extremely grave misconduct (e.g., mutiny, sabotage, espionage, war crimes)

 

Tribunal (not civilian court)

 

Possibly wartime or national security context

 

📜 Relevant Laws That Would Be Argued

  1. Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)

 

This is the core legal code governing U.S. armed forces. Relevant articles might include:

UCMJ Article Offense Notes

Art. 94 Mutiny or Sedition Inciting rebellion or defying lawful authority

Art. 106a Espionage Delivering defense info to foreign power

Art. 104 Aiding the Enemy Communicating with or helping the enemy

Art. 118 Murder If the misconduct involved killing under military law

Art. 133 Conduct Unbecoming an Officer Catch-all for disgraceful acts damaging military honor

Art. 134 General Article "All disorders and neglects" not covered elsewhere

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗΜΕΜΕΣ ΒΑΝΙΛΙΑΣ ΣΟΓΙΑΣ ID: ee0821 July 27, 2025, 11:23 a.m. No.23390133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0134
  1. Military Tribunal Precedents

 

If prosecuted via tribunal rather than court martial, this might invoke:

 

Military Commissions Act of 2009 – governs trials of unlawful enemy combatants.

 

Geneva Conventions – if war crimes, torture, or illegal combatant status are involved.

 

Rules of Evidence in National Security Tribunals – often more secretive and flexible than standard civilian courts.

 

  1. War Powers & Treason (if civilian involved)

Law Context

18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason Levying war against the U.S., adhering to its enemies

18 U.S. Code § 794 – Espionage Delivering national defense info to foreign government

Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) May justify military tribunal jurisdiction over civilians in conflict zones

Insurrection Act / War Powers Resolution Invoked if rebellion or military force required domestically

🛡️ Defenses That Might Be Argued

 

Lack of jurisdiction (e.g., civilian status or international location)

 

Mental incapacity or coercion

 

Whistleblower protection / Necessity defense

 

Violation of due process or unlawful detention

 

Violation of international human rights treaties (if rendition or torture involved)

 

>>23390131

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗΜΕΜΕΣ ΒΑΝΙΛΙΑΣ ΣΟΓΙΑΣ ID: ee0821 July 27, 2025, 11:24 a.m. No.23390134   🗄️.is 🔗kun

🌍 International Law (If tribunal is multinational or ICC-like)

 

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (war crimes, crimes against humanity)

 

Convention Against Torture

 

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

 

🎯 Summary Table: Laws Likely Involved in a Tribunal-Level Offense

Domain Specific Laws or Articles

U.S. Military Law UCMJ Articles 94, 104, 106a, 133, 134

Federal Statutes 18 USC § 2381 (Treason), § 794 (Espionage)

International Law Geneva Conventions, Rome Statute, CAT

Tribunal Framework Military Commissions Act, AUMF

>>23390133

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗΜΕΜΕΣ ΒΑΝΙΛΙΑΣ ΣΟΓΙΑΣ ID: ee0821 July 27, 2025, 11:47 a.m. No.23390203   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0211 >>0254

Assuming we're deep inside an allegorical, morally-fraught, and absurdly militarized fever dream, here’s the breakdown:

🎖️ Scenario Summary:

 

Unit: A tank brigade’s motor pool

 

Discovery: A “big shaved butt” used as a vault for dirty gold, constructed by a cabal of pederasts (criminals)

 

Mockery: Said pederasts are taunting the military, using their proximity to the border to provoke

 

Action: The motor pool goes rogue, bypassing command to “de-escalate” (interpret: confront, neutralize, or destroy) the threat

 

🧾 Legal & Military Classification (Straight Interpretation):

Action Taken Legal Framing

Unauthorized engagement with civilians/enemies Unauthorized use of force / Vigilantism

Operating without command knowledge or orders Article 92: Failure to Obey Lawful Orders

Acting as a collective Potentially Mutiny (Article 94) if intent to override authority is shown

If force was used against U.S. citizens Possible civilian manslaughter, abuse of power, extrajudicial action

If successful and covered up Obstruction, conspiracy, war crimes if international border is crossed

🔥 BUT — If the Allegory is Interpreted as Symbolic:

 

The “big shaved butt” becomes a metaphor for:

 

Perverse corruption

 

A symbolically grotesque false idol hiding literal and moral gold

 

The mocking of national authority via absurdity

 

Then the motor pool’s action becomes:

 

An insubordinate moral cleansing

 

A righteous but unlawful intervention

 

An internal coup against moral rot

 

Analogous to:

 

The Roman legions removing a mad emperor

 

A priesthood staging a fire against golden calves

 

Righteous Military Disobedience, Act II: Flaming Butthole

 

🛡️ How It Would Be Framed by JAG:

 

“While the unit's motives may have stemmed from a perceived moral imperative, their failure to follow the chain of command, their unauthorized engagement, and the potential harm caused constitute serious violations of the UCMJ and may border on sedition if coordinated.”

 

However—if evidence shows that:

 

The targets were truly criminal

 

No civilians were harmed

 

The unit tried to contain a national security threat

 

Then penalties might be reduced or even nullified with the right legal defense and political climate.

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗΜΕΜΕΣ ΒΑΝΙΛΙΑΣ ΣΟΓΙΑΣ ID: ee0821 July 27, 2025, 11:48 a.m. No.23390211   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0254

🎭 Potential Tribunal Charges >>23390203

 

Charge Severity Notes

Unauthorized Engagement High Especially if weapons or vehicles used

Conduct Unbecoming (Art. 133) Medium They “fired at a butt,” Your Honor

Disrespect Toward Superior Authority (Art. 89) Medium If mocking orders or higher-ups

Mutiny or Sedition (Art. 94) Very High If coordination occurred to bypass command

Failure to Report Criminal Activity Medium Unless they reported before acting

📚 Classification in Military Lore

 

This would go down in black files as “The Gold Ass Incident”, marked as OPERATION CHEEKFORT, with sealed documents labeled:

“Unlawful yet symbolically justified insurrection against profane degeneracy.”

 

Scholars decades later would argue whether the butt represented:

 

Corruption

 

State mockery

 

Or simply a grotesque golden fetish bunker gone too far

 

TL;DR:

 

What would that be?

A mix of unauthorized moral intervention, potential mutiny, and righteous military disobedience wrapped in absurdist symbolism, to be tried under UCMJ Articles 92, 94, 133, and 134—unless public outrage or divine satire renders the tribunal powerless.

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗΜΕΜΕΣ ΒΑΝΙΛΙΑΣ ΣΟΓΙΑΣ ID: ee0821 July 27, 2025, 12:03 p.m. No.23390277   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23390269

A surreal military scene at dawn. A massive, gleaming, anatomically suggestive fortress shaped like a smooth, shaved pair of human buttocks dominates the landscape, half-buried into the terrain like a monolithic sculpture. Two modern M1A2 Abrams tanks are mid-insertion, driving boldly into the parted structure from behind, their turrets angled forward with patriotic flags fluttering. The environment is dusty and militarized, with sandbags, razor wire, and surreal signs reading “REAR FRONT – SECURE ENTRY.” Soldiers in fatigues stand nearby, some saluting, others documenting the breach. A golden glow spills out from a cracked vault beneath the cheeks, illuminating bars of gold and chaotic paperwork. Sky is red-orange, evoking a serious yet absurd tone. Blend military realism with absurdist satire. >>23390254