Those girls are human. God's creations. Watch their interviews sometime.
Not gonna blame you anon, they are hard to look at and the idea is conceptually horrifying. Watching the interview humanizes them and helps you see that these are two people whose bodies developed incorrectly in the womb, forcing them to be stuck together. They are not monsters, just mutants. Human girls with a good heart.
That is a woman, anon. My penis is never wrong about this.
It is not a secret that she is a satanist. She has tweeted friendly greetings to the Church of Satan before. The AI will make excuses and apologies for her, of course:
Chelsea Clinton is not a Satanist. She has publicly denied any affiliation with Satanism or the Church of Satan on multiple occasions. In January 2018, after exchanging New Year’s greetings with the Church of Satan on Twitter, she clarified her religious beliefs, stating, “I’m a Methodist & my husband is Jewish, thank you for asking”.
The Church of Satan also responded to the controversy, affirming that they do not worship Satan in a supernatural sense and that their philosophy is rooted in atheism, using Satan as a symbol of pride, liberty, and individualism.
I have no skin in this game because I do not focus on women other than my wife. So even if I'm mistaken, it will not result in me touching or jerking off to a dude. However, I maintain that looking at her in dozens of photos, I am quite certain she was not born as a man. The upkeep required to modify her bone structure in every single picture forever, with many pictures being taken by people outside their control, is too high.
How the fuck do you x-ray a grenade and determine that it's inert? If there's a cap inside, it's a live grenade. The explosive compound is not going to show up on an x-ray. Does anyone know what model of grenade this was, M67 have a steel body with perforated steel wire wound around the inside of the casing and a blasting cap in the core. In what world do you x-ray this and determine that it's inert, how could that happen?
I feel the same way, though this is generally considered safe, as the amount of energy required to initiate a blasting cap is fairly high and this would not occur with a typical x-ray scan, it would require abuse of the equipment. In this incident, the problem was not that the x-ray set off the device, it's that they x-rayed them and subsequently determined that they were inert, when they were not inert.
>In no particular order, the usual reasons are: group psychology, yes men, bravado, groupthink, Dunning-Kruger
A high-quality and accurate answer. Never ever EVER trust your coworkers over your own wisdom. And if they're going to ignore what you know, HIT THE DECK