Wikipedia has long established itself as a website controlled by a coalition of partisan hacks. The latest example of the online encyclopedia’s attempt to literally rewrite the narrative appears on its article titled “Steele Dossier.”

Five paragraphs into Wikipedia’s detailed description of the document that fueled the Russia collusion hoax, the article claims that British spy Christopher Steele’s manufactured evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Moscow “did not play any role in the January 6, 2017 intelligence community assessment of the Russian actions in the 2016 election.”

The article even went so far as to deny that the Steele Dossier was the “trigger for the opening of the Russia investigation into whether the Trump campaign was coordinating with the Russian government’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.”

These were verifiably false claims years ago. A new batch of Russiagate documents recently declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard further confirmed that the debunked Steele Dossier not only made the ICA cut, but played a role in the plot to take down President Donald Trump.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/31/wikipedias-locked-steele-dossier-page-is-laced-with-lies-that-only-certain-users-can-correct/