MEME WARRIOR UI 1.3 #240904

OPERATIONS

Boot Camp https://archive.ph/B96YG

Basic Procedures https://archive.ph/GGsfy

Resources https://archive.is/2iZX1

Tools https://archive.is/wip/evm3M UPDATED

OPS https://archive.is/mFlvd UPDATED

Pins https://archive.is/wip/LE6KU UPDATED

MATERIAL

Memes https://archive.ph/CpEEH

Hash Board https://archive.ph/GD8LI

Game Theory https://archive.ph/bsaiD

Twitter Social https://archive.ph/XuQAg

Meme Cannon https://archive.ph/fvyYf

Op Overlord https://archive.ph/ZcgLh

Psyop Link Dump https://archive.ph/lfkTb

Videos *TOR http://trutube54vqa3baer2kc7aggfc5qstxkgcmzm4qxxzfaxdsihu3znzid.onion/

OPTICS

Focus https://archive.ph/4LPPi

4am https://archive.ph/kHgBH

Trends https://archive.ph/FO6SY

Socials https://archive.ph/v9u5L

Live https://archive.ph/Wft2a

Scheduled https://archive.ph/gNZbG

FOLLOW

X https://archive.ph/A6b5P

Truth https://archive.ph/3yMsU

Military https://archive.ph/M89S4

FBI https://archive.ph/Qe1Uc

Civilian https://archive.ph/xAbz6

DONATIONS (IMO) https://archive.ph/rmv1F

LETTERS https://archive.ph/kDxcC

DONALD TRUMP https://archive.ph/is8Gw

>>https://archive.is/3Pe0E

https://archive.is/evm3M

Tools and Services

Overturning Evenwel v. Abbott (2016), which affirmed that states can use total population (including non-citizens and undocumented immigrants) for redistricting, would be challenging due to the structure of the U.S. legal and constitutional system. Here are the potential avenues to overturn or challenge the precedent, along with their difficulties:New Supreme Court Case:Process: A new case would need to be brought to the Supreme Court, challenging the inclusion of non-citizens or undocumented immigrants in the census count for apportionment or redistricting. This could arise from a state or plaintiff arguing that only citizens should be counted, claiming the current practice violates constitutional principles (e.g., equal protection or representation).

Requirements: The case must present a novel legal argument or new evidence not addressed in Evenwel. The Court would need to accept the case (grant certiorari), which requires four justices’ approval. A majority (at least five justices) would then need to rule that the Constitution’s language (“whole number of persons”) excludes non-citizens or undocumented immigrants.

Challenges: The Evenwel decision relied on historical practice, constitutional text, and precedent, which strongly support counting all persons. The Court’s 2016 ruling was unanimous (8-0) in affirming total population as a permissible basis, making a reversal less likely. A new case would need to overcome stare decisis (the principle of respecting precedent) and address the textual clarity of “persons” in the Constitution.

https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=1953554530005647715

>>23438014

>What Is Q Exactly?

Q[i] = Energy = Your Energy

if anon had to guess