Anonymous ID: e4106a Aug. 10, 2025, 6:46 a.m. No.23448918   🗄️.is 🔗kun

US Air Force to deny retirement pay to transgender service members being separated from the service. Lump sum or nothing - regardless of years served.

 

CONSTANTIN TOROPIN

August 7, 2025

 

""WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. Air Force said Thursday it would deny all transgender service members who have served between 15 and 18 years the option to retire early and would instead separate them without retirement benefits. One Air Force sergeant said he was “betrayed and devastated” by the move.

 

The move means that transgender service members will now be faced with the choice of either taking a lump-sum separation payment offered to junior troops or be removed from the service.

 

….All transgender members of the Air Force are being separated from the service under the Trump administration’s policies.

 

Separation process has hit some bumps

 

The move comes after the Pentagon was given permission in early May by the Supreme Court to move forward with a ban on all transgender troops serving in the military. Days later, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a policy that would offer currently openly serving transgender troops the option to either volunteer to leave and take a large, one-time separation payout or be involuntarily separated at later date.

 

A Pentagon official told reporters in May that they viewed the policy as treating “anyone impacted by it with dignity and respect.”

 

However, in late July, transgender troops told Military.com that they were finding the entire separation process, which has included reverting their service records back to their birth gender, “dehumanizing” or “open cruelty.”

 

[Lawsuits are threatened.]

 

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/air-force/2025/08/us-air-force-to-deny-retirement-pay-to-transgender-service-members-being-separated-from-the-service

Anonymous ID: e4106a Aug. 10, 2025, 7:20 a.m. No.23449064   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23448918

>The move comes after the Pentagon was given permission in early May by the Supreme Court to move forward with a ban on all transgender troops serving in the military.

 

Clarification:

The Supreme Court's action in May 2025 that allowed the military service trans ban to be implemented was not a ruling on the merits, but rather it struck down the injunction on the Pentagon's policy - based on an Trump EO that reversed a Biden EO - thereby allowing the policy to be implemented by the Trump admin without a mere lawsuit against it being allowed to stop it in its tracks.

 

Article:

 

"The Supreme Court [in May] cleared the way for the Trump administration to enforce a Department of Defense policy prohibiting transgender people from serving in the U.S. military. With the court’s three Democratic appointees indicating that they would have denied the Trump administration’s request, the justices paused an order by a federal judge in Washington state that had barred the government from implementing the policy anywhere in the United States.

 

"Shortly after taking office in 2021, then-President Joe Biden signed an executive order that allowed transgender troops to serve openly in the military. On Jan. 20 of this year, President Donald Trump revoked Biden’s order and issued another order requiring Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to put into effect a ban on “individuals with gender dysphoria” – the medical term for the psychological distress caused by a conflict between the sex someone is assigned at birth and that person’s gender identity.

 

"On Feb. 26, the Department of Defense issued that ban, which generally disqualifies anyone who either has gender dysphoria or has undergone medical interventions to treat gender dysphoria from serving in the military. The department explained that “the medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals who have a current diagnosis or history of, or exhibit symptoms with, gender dysphoria are incompatible with the high mental and physical standards necessary for military service.”

 

"Seven current transgender members of the armed forces, along with one transgender person who would like to join the military and a nonprofit with members who either are transgender troops or would like to be, went to federal court to challenge the new policy. The lead plaintiff in the case, Commander Emily Shilling, has been a naval aviator for nearly two decades, and she estimates that the Navy has spent $20 million on her training.

 

"U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle agreed with the plaintiffs that the ban violated (among other things) the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. He called the policy a “de facto blanket ban on transgender service.”

 

"After the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit rejected the government’s request to freeze Settle’s order while the government’s appeal went forward, the Trump administration came to the Supreme Court on April 24.

 

"Without the Supreme Court’s intervention, the Trump administration told the justices, the district court’s order will stay in place while litigation continues in the 9th Circuit and, if necessary, the Supreme Court. That is, the Trump administration said, “a period far too long for the military to be forced to maintain a policy that it has determined, in its professional judgment, to be contrary to military readiness and the Nation’s interests.”

 

"The challengers countered that if the Supreme Court were to pause Settle’s order, it would “upend the status quo by allowing the government to begin discharging thousands of transgender servicemembers, including” them, “thereby ending distinguished careers and gouging holes in military units.”

 

"In a brief unsigned order issued on Tuesday afternoon, the court granted the Trump administration’s request to pause Settle’s order while the government’s appeal proceeds in the 9th Circuit and, if necessary, the Supreme Court. As is often the case for emergency appeals, the court did not provide any explanation for its decision."

 

The court’s three Democratic appointees – Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson – indicated that they would have denied the government’s request. But they too did not explain their reasoning.

 

www.scotusblog.com/2025/05/supreme-court-allows-trump-to-ban-transgender-people-from-military/