Thank you Baker

>>234614

ugh squirm mofo squirm, tick fucking tock…just a few miles away.

>>234622

The question I've has is, in any of the pics of the crash, do you see ANY of the people involved? reverse psyop? only for optics?

>>234651

5D chess.

>>234651

would also explain the Q 'Drone' reference…the train was a drone.

>>234685

ahh truck was expected, train was 'expected to be full of passengers'

>>234687

optics

>>234688

not saying out of the question…just using occams razor….

>>234712

less variables to have the truck there, and the train being the controllable asset

>>234715

If you knew that the op was going to happen in advance and you had your assets safe already, which ties into the Q 'all safe' message, 'all safe' has been a constant.

>>234743

speaking more on the train incident….but yes i can see your point.

>>234735

Theory, Congressmen were not on the train, they were already DUMB?

>>234763

and we go through semantics of all the other possibilities ;)

>>234790>>234828

can some one sauce me one pic of any of the people involved in any of these pictures? if not…its just semantics…optics…..

the an..fucking..keking..ticipation….

>>234876

oh damn

>>234932

interdasting

>>234953

run rabbit run rabbit..run..run..run.

>>234962

Kek

>>234980

Socratic reporting…whatatwist!

>>235006

Gone!!!!! run rabbit run!

>>235026

sauce? just asking…i have theory, you have yours, expand my thinking

>>235051

true

>>235072

dont mean to be a dick which Q post said slowly and carefully…

>>23514>>235145

Alternate being Shadilay777

>>235081

or this guy

>>235272

whait..what? how do you confabulate READING slowly and carefully tracking people who resign to a ..umm train moving slowly and carefully…thats a bit of a reach…sorry….my autism senses are not tingling on that connection…sorry….Drones baby…drones..