Not at all the same build.
BO isn't comped and he looks after his BVs. I'm not a shill but I support BV here. How much have we already read of media cherrypicking content from the board? How easy would it be for them to call this a "lewd, misogynistic, porn-infested conspiracy hotbed" rather than just "conspiracy forum?" I would prefer we minimize our own mistakes. We've had a tradition of baker girls but we haven't had as strong a tradition of nude baker girls. Let the nude half go. BVs stance is useful not just for this but also goreposting. I'm not shaken by it but I know newfags (who we're trying to convince!) will be, and so it's useful to allow the (proper, controlled, communicated, TRANSPARENT) censorship of plainly counterproductive posting. It's why we ban clown IPs. Yeah, some people can sift through the shilling, and the filter is a great tool, but some can't, and we don't want their fuckery contaminating the board to the public record.
again, inb4 shill; I don't think shills would take the time to write this, they would probably say "u like child porn or something shill" rather than this. my two cents
You missed the part from his website:
AVENATTI WORKED FOR RAHM EMANUEL
"While in college and later in law school, Michael worked at a political opposition research and media firm run by Rahm Emanuel… During his time there, Michael worked on over 150 campaigns in 42 states, including multiple gubernatorial and congressional campaigns (i.e. Joe Biden's Senate Campaign)"
https://avenatti.com/bio/
Sorry if this has already been spotted.
ofc
Thank you BO. But please for the sake of the board's unity, try to discern between innocent titposters and malevolent shills/spammers if possible.