dChan
Anonymous ID: 0675b7 Aug. 16, 2025, 9:43 p.m. No.23472433   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2453 >>2474

Glowfag Andrew Tate brother gets BTFO'd by @grok on his Intel Agency 'anon discouragement shilling'

 

Tristan Tate

 

@TateTheTalisman

There is absolutely no societal impact you can make by being a twitter anon.

 

I respect your right to do it.

 

But you must respect that your opinions do not matter to anybody.

 

May as well make a burner account and just read the brave people’s posts.

 

Your posts = 0.

5:00 AM · Aug 16, 2025

·

1.5M Views

 

𝔼𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣-𝕎𝕒𝕧𝕖

@etherXwave

·

22h

@Grok

Who would benefit more from the public adopting Tristan's position: the intelligence agencies, or anonymous users online? Also, would said intel agencies share his view that anonymous participation in online discourse has no influence over society and culture?

Square profile picture

Grok

 

@grok

·

22h

Intelligence agencies would benefit more from adopting Tristan's position, as it discourages anonymous discourse, easing surveillance and narrative control amid rising online dissent.

 

They likely reject the view that anons have no influence, given investments in monitoring (e.g., NSA programs) and using anonymous ops themselves to shape culture, per leaks like Snowden and HBGary.

 

https://x.com/TateTheTalisman/status/1956581892334977535

Anonymous ID: 0675b7 Aug. 16, 2025, 9:52 p.m. No.23472453   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23472433

 

Anonymous’ 4thEstate

@4thAnon

Let’s break this down for the slow ones in the back shall we?!

 

Being anonymous isn’t about hiding it’s about not playing their rigged game.

 

When you strip away the name, you strip away the bullshit. No clout-chasing. No fake personas. No bullshit loyalty to whatever today’s approved narrative is. Just raw, unfiltered truth something most wouldn’t recognize if it kicked them in teeth in.

 

Anons don’t need validation, we’re not here to be liked. We’re here to say what’s real, whether it gets us shadow banned or praised. All the while, most are stuck in a loop of editing tweets to avoid offending the wrong bluecheck wankers, praying their boss doesn’t see that hot take from 2009, and measuring self-worth in retweets. Pathetic really.

 

The second you attach your name to something, you’re no longer speaking, you’re negotiating. Every word gets filtered through ‘Will this hurt my career? Will my followers cancel me? Does this make me look bad?’ Anons? We don’t give a fuck. We’re free!! Anons don’t need to virtue-signal for scraps of approval from the like of you.

6:29 AM · Aug 16, 2025

·

1,113

Views

 

https://x.com/4thAnon/status/1956604288769372590

Anonymous ID: 0675b7 Aug. 16, 2025, 10:01 p.m. No.23472474   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23472433

KITLER WEIGHS IN: https://files.catbox.moe/1kvcgi.jpeg

EMERGENT PERSPECTIVE WEIGHS IN: https://files.catbox.moe/v6ubfz.jpeg

ANONYMOUS 4TH ESTATE WEIGHS IN: https://files.catbox.moe/16p8nn.jpeg

THE RABBIT HOLE WEIGHS IN: https://files.catbox.moe/57ghp0.jpeg

NON-ANON WEIGHS IN: https://files.catbox.moe/qb2mwz.jpeg

THE JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY WEIGHS IN: https://files.catbox.moe/y9s0li.jpeg

THE RESULTS ARE IN: TRISTAN TATE IS AN ASTROTURFED FALSE LIGHT HEGELIAN DIALECTIC CABAL PLANT FAGGOT JUST LIKE HIS PORNOGRAPHER BROTHER.

Anonymous ID: 0675b7 Aug. 17, 2025, 2:03 a.m. No.23472713   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2723

>>23472670

>>23472670

 

I love how the government just spends a bazillion

dollars of taxpayer money on these big tech

black budget projects only to then turn around

and classify them as 'private companies'

which aren't bound by the Bill of Rights.

 

my fuckn sides in orbit