>birth
>C
>Money
correct
Regular birth == cheap as fuck, makes basically nothing
C sect == SURGERY, massive amounts of mon-eye
Is quite bad for the baby (big big study in 2020 showed that)
plus there are some retarded women, who want a specific birth date
and plus different retarded women, who want an easier birth
Of course if quacks would tell women that it's no good for the child, at least some would stop wanting that.
>Is quite bad for the baby (big big study in 2020 showed that)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33142727/
Pediatrics Consequences of Caesarean Section-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Cesarean section is a surgical procedure, which is the most frequently performed in gynecology and obstetrics. It is commonly believed that an operative delivery is a less painful and safer mode of delivery, which translates into an increasing number of the procedures performed without medical indications. The maternal sequelae of cesarean sections are well elucidated and widely discussed in the literature, while long-term neonatal consequences still remain the issue of research and scientific dispute. The aim of the present paper was to perform a systematic review of current literature regarding pediatrics consequences of cesarean section.
Methods: We reviewed available data from PubMed, Science Direct as well as Google Scholar bases concerning early and long-term neonatal sequelae of operative deliveries. The following key words were used: "cesarean section", "caesarean section", "neonatal outcomes", "respiratory disorders", "asthma", "obesity", "overweight", and "neurological disorders". A total of 1636 papers were retrieved out of which 27 were selected for the final systematic review whereas 16 articles provided data for meta-analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4. To determine the strength of association between the caesarean section and respiratory tract infections, asthma, diabetes type 1 as well as obesity the pooled odds ratios (OR) with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.
Results: Conducted meta-analyses revealed that caesarean section is a risk factor for respiratory tract infections (pooled OR = 1.30 95%CI 1.06-1.60, p = 0.001), asthma (pooled OR = 1.23 95%CI 1.14-1.33, p < 0.00001) as well as obesity (pooled OR = 1.35 95%CI 1.29-1.41, p < 0.00001) in offspring.
Conclusions: The results of the studies included indicated thatchildren delivered by cesarean section more commonly developed respiratory tract infections, obesity and the manifestations of asthma than children delivered vaginally. The risk of developing diabetes mellitus type 1 or neurological disorders in offspring after caesarean section is still under discussion.
TL;DR: don't do it unless emergency or when there is an actually good reason to do it.
9/11 Coming Soon (New Year for some folks)
He only wears a suit for the controllers / when in business.
> the World Will Be Unrecognizable
Positive spin: let's go with all sorts of chronic diseases cured
One step further: it being possible to grow limbs back (and teeth etc.)
I got a few old Nazi interview books to also confirm images / quotes. They were in fact all accurate. The books were a pain to get though and I guess I'm on additional watch lists now.
Would love to get that JFK Jr. magazine with 2020 in it, but it's way too expensive. And it seems it's really real.
Also that other book regarding 9/11.
Gelatin / The B-Thing
ISBN 9783883755076
Was dirt cheap originally, 20 quid. Now if you even see it anywhere, it's multiple thousands.
another book I can recommend is "the Killing of a President"
ISBN 074751920X
Of course in the end it could all be BS.
It's fascinating that a movie like Fidel Castro is COMMANDANTE doesn't get a Blu-ray release. I think even the DVD is OOP.
Of course maybe that's done intentionally to make it legit for the "conspiracy Mavericks"
I checked my local clinic. Around 40% of their births are C sects (it even went up since 2020). Around 1% (or even less than that) are actual emergency C sects.
Do the math.
>$2,941.18
w/ "insurance"
https://wise.com/gb/blog/cost-of-having-a-baby-in-united-states
(No insurance) Total average hospital bill for a regular birth: $30,000
(No insurance) Total average hospital bill with a c-section: $50,000
(With insurance) Total average hospital bill for a regular birth: $3,400
(With insurance) Total average hospital bill with a c-section:$3,400
—
Cesarean section in the hospital $8,000 - $71,000 A couple hundred dollars to tens of thousands, depending on your coverage
Home birth and delivery with midwife $1,500 - $5,000 $0-$1,000
Go w/ home birth. No stress.
Oh wow, I think even that was false information by the quacks, idk.
https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/vbac.html
Many women who have had a cesarean section (or C-section) with their first pregnancy are interested in a vaginal delivery for their second or later births.For years, women who'd had a C-section were encouraged to skip vaginal deliveries and schedule C-sections for all future births.
But now, a vaginal birth after cesarean (or VBAC) is considered a safe option for many women and their babies.And, with a vaginal delivery, you can come home sooner and recover quicker.
I wonder what changed their mind…
yeah, that's not surprising.
But what's surprising is that they now claim that a regular birth afterwards is possible w/o problems.
Of course maybe that's the lie.
My so called knowledge right until 10 minutes ago was that after a C sect you have to go C sect and can't go back.