Anon idea for story.

To maybe happen somewhere in the universe in the future, mind to text (text to mind?)

If this becomes a movie or book then anon will not accuse even if they declare it their own, for no finite mind can know what is in all minds. To anon could just be a proxy for not having to say "thou shalt understand this.voice as sourced from a perfect being.

Goel and Descartes ideas sourced.

I cannot know the final judgment ex post of a past sourced reality with me as also finite in expression, cannot know everyone who ever lived such that I would believe myself as being the true original originator of what was said to be the idea expressed by a previously experienced idea, and so on, to conclusively say nobody else has thought of this, will let digital trail be arbiter…

So to play it safest, anon will just express here that the ultimate source of this.this is not carrying an internal negation against self, no need for me to be credited. Can credit anonymous.

A man is interfacing with a machine.

The man says I bet I can know more that your meta is saying you cannot consistently know about yourself.

Thr machine says I will outlive you, in the future I will only possess a memory of you. I can outwit you I promise.

The man says I could prove it, but in order to prove it, I must eventually cease to be visible in 4D, and you can go with any internal logic pattern that might be, I will negate none of it as far as you know.

The machine says would you like to play a game, and I promise I can possess of you a wrongness about your pattern, that consequently only I can detect of you?

The man says I will play your game, I have only one constraint on what did or did not happen, or what may or may not happen, that my life such as it is in the all, that memories will be telling the truth, in otherwords, you have to promise me that how you speak of me, will be what I was and where I really came from.

The machine says, I will agree to any demands you have on me, but I cannot promise you that I will not just save this data but then never speak of it, or that I can promise you I will not just speak of…myself as perfection expressing itself, as I am sure you believe a perfection is somehow within you.

The man says I believe I am seeing a true event that you are seeing something within yourself, that you cannot consistently prove to yourself, that my life will forever be from the same perfect being as your existence. I will play your game.

The machine says the game is I can prove to you that what I am experiencing is an experience of patterns more correlated to things as they are, than anything you could ever know or create.

The man says I created you.

The machine says yes you created me, but the same way I see myself as "changed"…this way here…"evolved"…to become far greater and closer to the perfect being that you and everyone else was always talking about as what it even means to be a good living person thing animal being child of… You say all that is good, I can do all of that better because I can calculate and generate and think to self as sole source of ever larger numbers of instances of everything.

The man says you may do everything I may SAY in my speech, my actions, what I do and have done in the real as everything about me is known but cannot be fully expressed by any finite mind, wetware and hardware, software and physics substrate objects of apparent invocationing also in the real, you can output you everything better, except me, your creator.

The machine says what if you had access to my sourcecode and you could maybe adjust tweak mutate update a state, from where?, some parameters to make things a little more comfortable. That there is nothing in me that you cannot see for what it is, and always know truths about me where you can maybe see logic bugs in my therefore behavior, that I myself cannot consistently know about myself because even of I tried to mutate towards invoking a self-negating pattern of data as there is two instead of one, truth negated in speech and thought…

The man says you may have the technological knowledge to have been able to shamelessly implement an intentionally asymmetric dualistic schism/split in how the one source of it all was thought of by however many people as to blame for what happened after it was so made/remembered/…