Anonymous ID: 405be5 July 29, 2018, 11:02 p.m. No.2350780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1015

Last comment on PB:

 

>>2350684

 

The only halfway I can see is to require Spoiler cover. Hell, that's what it's there for. I and many other autists do not care so much about the tits thing–it's the going back on your word about NO CENSORSHIP.

 

Put a message up saying that spoilered images may not have been reviewed by BV/BO yet and could contain illegal content. And drop ALL censorship–like the board manifest said when Q brought us here.

Anonymous ID: 405be5 July 29, 2018, 11:34 p.m. No.2351131   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2350833

Anons are not mad because they can't post porn on a Q fucking research board. What a fucking incendiary remark. Shame on you, smartass.

 

It's about the board's manifest saying there is no censoring and the fact that it is a lie–free speech/press is more than porn. Grow the fuck up and be more American.

Anonymous ID: 405be5 July 29, 2018, 11:36 p.m. No.2351146   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2350893

It's not about boobs, you boob. It's about censoring even a single ASCII character when the board's manifest clearly say NO CENSORING.

 

Stop trying to restart the argument with your incendiary remarks.

Anonymous ID: 405be5 July 29, 2018, 11:42 p.m. No.2351190   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2350852

Once a-fucking-gan, it is about Q bringing us here because there is no censorship–it's even written in the goddamned manifest for the board. It's not about boobs. It's about freedom of speech/press/expression. Be more American. You're infecting the populace with censorship.

 

In short order, you'll be in trouble for using that faggots word you just did. That's SJW-speak for hate speech. Get it now?

Anonymous ID: 405be5 July 29, 2018, 11:51 p.m. No.2351249   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2350917

Again. It's NOT about the boobs. The board manifest says NO CENSORSHIP. That's why Q brought us here. It's about down-home American freedom of speech/press/expression.

 

If you are still convinced it's about boobs, consider how many censoring SJW's would stab you for saying the word fag–like you just did. Where is the line?

Anonymous ID: 405be5 July 29, 2018, 11:54 p.m. No.2351281   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1287 >>1289 >>1293 >>1309 >>1323 >>1326

>>2350949

Rest assured, four VERY good autists have gone. I don't know they'll be back but censorship does that to autists.

 

I''m barely hanging on myself, here.

 

Like I said earlier,

>>2350917

It's NOT about the boobs. The board manifest says NO CENSORSHIP. That's why Q brought us here. [and that's why we followed] It's about down-home American freedom of speech/press/expression.

 

If you are still convinced it's about boobs, consider how many censoring SJW's would stab you for saying the word fag–like you just did. Where is the line?

Anonymous ID: 405be5 July 30, 2018, midnight No.2351316   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1350 >>1354

>>2351293

For now at least. And don't you dare disrespect them. Losing their talents is a loss–they pulled some magic outta their ass here… at least two of them did. Calling a patriot butthurt because he walked away from censoring his freedom of speech/press/expression is the antithesis of American patriotism.

 

Shame on you.