Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:10 p.m. No.2350864   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0884 >>0983

>>2350813

explain this to anons:

how does censoring images on a fucking image board get rid of CP?

if a fucking shill posts CP, delete it, no one is posting porn but the fucking gay/black porn shill who posts the gore, which we got the NOPE button for anyway

 

and do you support censoring anons further?

I haven't heard anything from the AmishBV or the BO on assurances this will not escalate

first thing to go are images THE ONE BV doesn't like, then posts, then bans, the blanket bans, then we're back to AFLB tier shit

answer those questions.. please

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:21 p.m. No.2350994   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1006

WE HAVE THE FUCKING NOPE BUTTON FOR A REASON

IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, HIDE IT, AND IT HIDES IT EVEN WHEN REPOSTED

IF THERE IS CP, __DELETE THAT SHIT RIGHT AWAY AMISHBV/BVs/BO

CENSORSHIP OF ANY KIND IS A CULTURAL MARXIST TACTIC OF SUBVERSION AND DIVISION

 

 

at least give anons a commitment it WON'T GO ANY FURTHER

censorship NEVER stops at the first attack

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:24 p.m. No.2351023   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1049 >>1096

>>2350983

>I recognize your hash so let's break down your post because you've brought up fine points.

thank you, I tried to be reasoned with them>They're posting late teen nude girls, if we remove them without saying anything we're hiding the fact we're removing things. There's certainly no way for us to tell one way or the other how old someone is from a single picture.

Who is "they're"? ITS NOT ANONS I CAN ASSURE YOU, shills are gonna shill no matter what, you and all REAL anons know that

>No, in fact censoring nudity was not a comfy decision for us to make.

I hope it wasn't, its a slippery slope, the first strike in censorship is NEVER the last

>AFLB was removed for banning people for saying shit they don't like. I'm one of the BV's who pushed for AFLB's removal in February after the first 'Bannening'.

THATS WHAT ANONS THINK THIS WILL PEAK INTO

>Please shoot me if I end up like AFLB.

no one wants that

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:26 p.m. No.2351049   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2351023

PLUS, forgot this:

you HAVE to admit the muh porn shills (who are the same shills that do the other tactics like muh larp, muh notables, muh FE, and other) ARE FEELING EMBOLDENED AND LIKE THEY ARE CHANGING BOARD CULTURE AND CRATING DIVISION

 

you have to admit shills are exploiting this

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:30 p.m. No.2351088   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1094

They want you DIVIDED!

They call us names.

They make threats.

They censor.

They lie.

They project.

They cheat.

They steal.

They harm.

They are sick.

They are evil.

At some point the streets (for them) will not be safe.

Q

 

ANONS ARE NOT THE ONES DOING THIS FOR FUCKS SAKE

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:41 p.m. No.2351175   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1219 >>1265

>>2351096

>I don't know what to tell you, I don't have names.

its only shills that post CP and RARELY, I could count on two hands the amount of times I've seen that

I'M TRYING TO TELL YOU, THE BVs, AND THE BO, THERE IS ONE SHILL THAT POSTS PICS OF "HIS KIDS" __WHICH WE CAN'T CONFIRM THEY'RE NOT MISSING AND EXPLOITED, AND HAVE INDUCED MANY ANONS TO REPORT IT GLOBALLY

thats probably where the reports are coming from, among the RARE other cases

>We don't have the people power to check every thots bush and tits for developmental signs they're not minors.

I understand that, but I can say for a FACT NO ANONS POST CP OR -18 women, for that matter, usually not even ~18

>To be totally clear the first strike in censorship on our end was the removal of gorespam.

thats in the board rules though, AND CLEARLY A SHILL, LIKE ALL POSTS OF CP ARE

>BO will not let another AFLB happen. Tits BV was removed for larping as R.

wait, which BV was the one larping as R, anons had a lot of problems with that too (in the Rbantz I think, not sure)

>I appreciate it, but standards must be maintained.

I believe they have been

>Shills will exploit literally anything.

yes they will

>We can change the decision people, we need a commitment from the community to report to both us and the globals though.

 

WE ALWAYS DO

 

I, anon, do solemnly swear to report EVERY CASE OF SUSPECTED CP GLOBALLY, AND TO TRY TO GET THE ATTENTION OF THE BVs AND/OR BO.

I COMMIT TO MAINTAINING THE LEGALITY OF THIS BOARD AT ALL TIMES I AM ON IT, AND TO MAINTAIN THE COMMUNITY WE HAVE BUILT OVER HARD WORKED MONTHS.

 

kek, off the top of my head (not a lawfag either) you could make copypasta, or annouce this to anons, they OF COURSE WOULD BE HELPFUL AND BE YOUR EYES AND EARS AT ALL TIMES

Anons genuinely HATE any signs of censorship, which has the shill emboldened and invigorated, which we then fought back, CAUSING THE BATTLE OF THE BOOB

WWG1WGA

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:49 p.m. No.2351239   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1290 >>1446

>>2351155

true, consensus is building, but still not too sure

>>2351159

mmmeeeeehhhh not sure

P = pope = chair = C

  • takes orders from P and P = C = Chair serves the master, which is ++

 

but heres the grpahic I meant to post, muh bad, posting 'too much text' with the BV, kek

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 29, 2018, 11:54 p.m. No.2351274   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1317 >>1345 >>1439 >>1462 >>1465

>>2351218

>that a "D5" and a "Trident II" are two different things, etc., etc. are nothing but clown/shill bullshit.

do you mean that SHILLS are saying that they're different things OR that SHILLS are saying they're the same?

because they are the same

https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/trident-ii-d5-fleet-ballistic-missile/

and the most recent crumbs indicate a ohio class sub

 

the going theory is that they wanted to catch AF1 with an airburst mid flight over the pacific but AF1/POTUS got word so re-routed PRIOR to landing

they launched anyway and tried to hit an unknown target (as you said, the range indicates it could be so many) yet it was shot down by a F16 with a NCADE type anti ballistic missile weapon system

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 30, 2018, 12:04 a.m. No.2351352   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2351265

>I've seen the kids 'memes' fucking creepy, but there's someone posting what looks to be eastern European girls too. (These get removed by globals)

good, anons have noticed that too, and we HATE it

>On an anonymous imageboard, how do you tell the shills from the anons? CP does get posted, someone has to be posting it.

thinking logical (meme needed), anyone posting CP is a shill, not an anon

ANONS DON'T POST CP, and if they do, they are then by process of elimination (shill or anon) a shill

>Just letting you know this place isn't technically censorship free.

we know that, nothing truly is, but its the best we got and don't like infringements of any kind or severity (clearly bewbs aren't the biggest deal, but its not about bewbs, its about censorship, as my hash likely shows me saying, kek)

>Tits BV, aka 'LowKey' or whatever they were larping as.

you might also see I've been vocal against the Rshills because I think its a textbook way to infiltrate, subvert, discredit, and divide

same AIM level nonsense we've dealt with, but moar sophisticated and coordinated (YT/twatter/FB)

 

I propose this, and if BO/other BVs are lurking, I hope you can see (kek at least in this discussion, I've been very reasonable, thoughtful, and rational), something like this:

 

1. make a pledge, likely by the BO/you BVs like this (in honor the crumbs) yet about what you expect from anons:

 

I [name] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

 

2. start a thread, for anons to use MOST/IF NOT ALL THEIR VPN IPs (you really should have one anons) to post the pledge

3. ENFORCE THE RULES, CP GETS A BAN AND REMOVED, GORE GETS A BAN AND REMOVED

I think many anons would be willing, ready, and able to agree to this

 

 

consider the preceding

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 30, 2018, 12:09 a.m. No.2351382   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2351345

>Do you think RED OCTOBER connects into this?

YES

I've read its likely they have moar than 1 sub

so I think the RED_OCTOBER signature was for the FIRST SUB (Hawaii)

the exopolitics sauce ( https://www.exopolitics.org/the-secret-navy-behind-the-ballistic-missile-attack-on-hawaii/ ) infers that one was sunk (per 'high level C_A sauces)

 

BUT, its likely it also WAS NOT SUNK, meaning its the SAME

but that conflicts with the "we have the sub" and "the hunt was dropped" crumbs

 

so I'm not sure, just trying to build the timeline of the newest CABAL sub attack

building of the Hawaii one

THE C_A HAS SUBS (and other navy/air/ground assets) PAID FOR AND IN OPERATION

and some went rogue

 

so to summarize, i think but not sure so meh

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 30, 2018, 12:19 a.m. No.2351425   🗄️.is 🔗kun

shit sauce, I'm tired but yes, ohio class subs can use cruise missiles

but I've read its either or

and the "missing 'D'" seems to point to D5 Tridents

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 30, 2018, 12:24 a.m. No.2351460   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2351408

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/02/the-presidents-secret-air-force-215091

there is precedent

an attempted attack WOULD warrant one

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 30, 2018, 12:27 a.m. No.2351475   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2351468

but no confirmation if there WAS a decoy flight

I've dug hard and haven't found any

(likely highly classified, and since it happened in early june, NOT declassified)

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 30, 2018, 12:28 a.m. No.2351480   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1481

326a96: muh porn

fc479d : red head shill (posted CP yesterday night, BV did nothing)

c62c0d : muh porn

cfb9ea : muh porn

487f76 : muh porn

91cf9e : muh porn

7960d3 : muh porn

321f9b : muh porn

487f76 : muh porn

ccc90f : muh porn

Anonymous ID: 492db0 July 30, 2018, 12:33 a.m. No.2351512   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1533

WHAT THE FUCK BV, WHY ARE MY NON "PORN" (NON ARE PORN) PICS ON OTHER THREADS BEING DELETED???????

a fucking side by side and the example for the password thread

THIS IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT FFS