>>2350845

>Autists do not fall for this 'punish the group to solve the problem' tactic. Please try not to.

There's only 4 of us, if the community wants to step up, check, and REPORT to us and to the GLOBALS questionable content then we can be less fucking faggots about this.

>>2350864

I recognize your hash so let's break down your post because you've brought up fine points.

>if a fucking shill posts CP, delete it, no one is posting porn but the fucking gay/black porn shill who posts the gore, which we got the NOPE button for anyway

They're posting late teen nude girls, if we remove them without saying anything we're hiding the fact we're removing things. There's certainly no way for us to tell one way or the other how old someone is from a single picture.

>and do you support censoring anons further?

No, in fact censoring nudity was not a comfy decision for us to make.

>I haven't heard anything from the AmishBV or the BO on assurances this will not escalate

AFLB was removed for banning people for saying shit they don't like. I'm one of the BV's who pushed for AFLB's removal in February after the first 'Bannening'.

>first thing to go are images THE ONE BV doesn't like, then posts, then bans, the blanket bans, then we're back to AFLB tier shit

Please shoot me if I end up like AFLB.

>>2350954

Check the mod log, globals only get involved when removing CP.

At the end of the day we have a CP problem anons. What do? Say we rescind this uncomfy decision, will you all step up and help us out?

>>2351023

>Who is they're

I don't know what to tell you, I don't have names.

>shills are gonna shill no matter what, you and all REAL anons know that

We don't have the people power to check every thots bush and tits for developmental signs they're not minors.

>I hope it wasn't, its a slippery slope, the first strike in censorship is NEVER the last

To be totally clear the first strike in censorship on our end was the removal of gorespam.

>THATS WHAT ANONS THINK THIS WILL PEAK INTO

BO will not let another AFLB happen. Tits BV was removed for larping as R.

>no one wants that

I appreciate it, but standards must be maintained.

>you have to admit shills are exploiting this

Shills will exploit literally anything.

We can change the decision people, we need a commitment from the community to report to both us and the globals though.

>>2351175

I've seen the kids 'memes' fucking creepy, but there's someone posting what looks to be eastern European girls too. (These get removed by globals)

>I understand that, but I can say for a FACT NO ANONS POST CP OR -18 women, for that matter, usually not even ~18

On an anonymous imageboard, how do you tell the shills from the anons? CP does get posted, someone has to be posting it.

>thats in the board rules though, AND CLEARLY A SHILL, LIKE ALL POSTS OF CP ARE

Just letting you know this place isn't technically censorship free.

>wait, which BV was the one larping as R, anons had a lot of problems with that too (in the Rbantz I think, not sure)

Tits BV, aka 'LowKey' or whatever they were larping as.

Pic related is a CP ban from today.

>>2351261

WELL WHAT DO YOU WANT TO KNOW YOU REDTEXTING FAGGOT