>>2350597 lb

with banning nudes now comes drawing a distinction between what is nude and what is not. Is a mannequin nude? How about barely clothed girls? Is that ok?

Once you start a ban, BV will then be forced to determine what is a nude is his/her eyes. That's gonna lead to discrimination. Then where do you draw the line? Who then becomes the king to make those decisions?

Is a nude work of art going to be banned? What about the disgusting artwork in Podestas home. Will that also be banned? It was a stupid decision to ban nudes.

>>2350802

pretty girls from modeling. Should they be banned too?

>>2350864

Not a single one of the shills pushing for banning has yet to explain how banning nudes will prevent cp from being posted.

>>2350878

Why? They are pics readily available on the net and in advertisers fliers. What is wrong posting them?

>>2350901

DO you understand what the pic means?

>>2350894

reported for what?

>>2350945

Exactly! Think they want to strangle parents who put their daughters in beauty pageants? Isn't that wrong? Or want them to get into modeling? Logic escapes shit heads here.

>>2351011

apparently it isn't. All about muy feelz.

>>2351035

You assume so much yet know so little. You even miss the whole point.