>>2350616 ==launch Vid was June 10, day POTUS left Canadian G7 on towards Singapore — we agree on that, correct?
Another anon said elsewhere AF-1 was about 1 hr out from landing, if a D5, goal was to strike Singapore & blame China, NK, etc??
>>2350846 ===>Yes, yes anon…… the bottom frame of the Vid confirms June 10.
But holy sheezzt…… it just occurred to me.
This one frame from the slow time lapsed vid deceived me….
We need a photogfag on this…… ie, the shutter must be open longer,
ergo, the exhaust light I think appears actually LONGER on the still than it would be if it was a true snap shot photo, or seen w/ a regular speed video or naked eye.
You follow??……
But alas, I saw another anon's consideration that launching a cruise vs a D5 are HUGELY different in terms of levels of readiness & CoC involvement.
I think that's basically where most of us are at w/ this.
So depending on location of AF-1, if a D5, it would have the range for sure (wouldn't even need to detonate very close),
but if a Cruise missile, would have to be dead on full strike & rely on shorter range / distance given limitations of cruise missiles.