>>23506434 lb
or just bid on tickets to HRC & BHO's Treason Season Finale
>>23506434 lb
or just bid on tickets to HRC & BHO's Treason Season Finale
tank q bakerman
spoiler that shit anon
https://www.wndnewscenter.org/chill-speech-through-stigma-colorado-campaign-to-obliterate-1st-amendment-gets-called-out-in-court/
‘Chill speech through stigma’: Colorado campaign to obliterate 1st Amendment gets called out in court
The all-Democrat government in Colorado – governor’s office, state House, state Senate and state Supreme Court – for years has had an agenda to eliminate the rights protected by the First Amendment.
It has tried over and over to set state requirements for speech that try to control the messages that people and organizations are allowed to express.
And now it’s getting sued for its latest scheming.
NetChoice, a social media corporation trade organization, sued the state “to stop the government’s attacks on websites that host free speech.”
The organization said in an announcement the state law, HB 24-1136, “mandates that websites display state-approved ‘warning’ messages to deter users from using online services and to promote the government’s controversial views on social media.”
“States can’t do by ‘warning label’ what they can’t do by outright ban. Trying to chill speech through stigma is still unconstitutional censorship, and we’re fighting to stop it in NetChoice v. Weiser,” the organization announced.
“At its core, this case is about one thing: compelled speech. Colorado is trying to force private websites to act as a mouthpiece for its preferred message,” said @Paul_Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center.
“The state is free to share its view on any topic it wishes, but it cannot force private businesses to speak for it. When the government speaks for itself, there is no problem, but when it coerces others to speak, the government plainly violates the First Amendment.”
The state’s latest battle against constitutional rights involves its scheming to force websites and online publishers to state the state’s messages, whether they agree or not.
“It doesn’t matter whether it’s a billboard, a newspaper or a website—the government can’t force businesses to malign themselves because politicians don’t like them,” the organization said.
NEW LAWSUIT: NetChoice Sues to Stop Colorado’s Censorship Attack on Free Expression Online
DENVER—Today, NetChoice sued Colorado to stop the government’s attacks on websites that host free speech. HB 24-1136 mandates that websites display state-approved “warning” messages to… pic.twitter.com/IW4W2tJwBt
— NetChoice (@NetChoice) August 14, 2025
The case explains the First Amendment protects free speech, free expression and free thought, but Colorado’s law is at attempt to destroy all three.
“True safety measures don’t require violating the First Amendment,” it said.
A report at Complete Colorado said the state is demanding “advisory labels for underage users warning of the brain development effects of social media use.”
NetChoice is representing companies including Meta, Pinterest, Reddit, YouTube, and X and others.
The state’s demand for “popup warnings” takes effect in 2026.
The lawsuit reads, in part: “Colorado’s attempt to compel a content-based, speaker-based, and vague collection of ‘social media platforms’ to discourage minors from using their services is equally unlawful.”
The state has gone to war against Christians multiple times in recent years, attempting to force them to spout the state’s leftist messaging, specifically regarding the LGTB agenda.
Under homosexual Gov. Jared Polis, the state went all the way to the Supreme Court to try to force baker Jack Phillips to promote same-sex ideology with his cake artistry. The state lost, and got scolded by the high court for its “hostility” to Christianity.
The state did the same thing with a wedding site web designer, and lost again.
It is pursuing yet a third case, this time restricting the free speech of counselors, a case that hasn’t reached a final resolution yet
https://slaynews.com/news/peter-navarro-calls-investigation-fbi-agents-targeted-trump/
Peter Navarro Calls for Investigation into FBI Agents Who Targeted Him and Trump
Peter Navarro is calling for actions to be taken against the FBI agents who targeted him and President Donald Trump with political investigations.
Navarro specifically called for an investigation into Walter Giardina, an agent who was recently fired by FBI Director Kash Patel.
Navarro told Breitbart News:
“The FBI and the DOJ went after Donald John Trump, dating back from 2016 all the way to President Trump being elected in November of 2024.”
It was the Obama administration that worked with Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign to launch the Russian collusion hoax, and Obama’s FBI did much of the heavy lifting in the campaign to crush Trump’s presidential run.
While Patel has been purging the FBI of those political actors, it’s clear that simply firing these people isn’t enough.
Navarro, along with many Trump supporters, wants criminal consequences for the blatant political corruption of the past decade.
Navarro singled out Giardina for his role in the Russian collusion hoax, saying:
“So the Giardina story starts in 2016 with the Christopher Steele dossier.
“That was the dossier. It was totally fake.
“It was presented as an intelligence report, paid for by Hillary Clinton, and the whole purpose of that was to create a Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.”
The Steele dossier was the subject of intense scrutiny for years, as it was the basis of the allegations against Trump.
We now know that it was fraudulent and paid for by the Clinton campaign, and Obama’s FBI accepted the so-called “dossier” without investigating it.
Navarro continued by explaining:
“And once that was done, that set in motion the whole ball of wax.
“It set in motion Crossfire Hurricane operation by the FBI and DOJ to get Trump.
“That, in turn, morphed into the Mueller report.”
Giardina, as one of the chief architects of the corrupt investigation against Trump, must pay the price.
KEK
But only one cuz this just makes the liars, ooops, lawyers richer!
flag burning is malicious mischief! if you can't do the time, you shouldn't commit the crime! so lawyer up $$$ or accept the fine!
jus sayin is all.. - thank you for reading this far, carry on scrollin down. i want to go up!