>except the EO doesnt say what YOU believe. it states to use the act as a predicate to charge ancillary crimes. nice try antifa(ggot)
I was skeptical before I read it, but it is rather nicely done.
All sorts of flagrantly illegal and objectively harmful shit is currently going unprosecuted due to supposed 1A protection (blocking highways wtf).
Hopefully this is an entry point for BOTH upholding the 1st Amendment AND prosecuting the bullshit.
>If you’re busy torching a flag what ancillary crimes would you be committing?
You could literally be impaling someone on the pole, and Soros prosecutors woulds say, sorry, Johnson vs Texas says this is protected speech.
Yes, but not if you are trying to burn down Los Angeles.
You are confused.
The Colorado baker WON on a FREE SPEECH argument.
The freedom to REJECT compelled speech is the flipside of the freedom to engage in voluntary speech.
The baker was being asked to engage in expressive activity in support of a cause he rejected, and the Supreme Court RIGHTLY supported his 1A right to do that.
1A is best A.