Anonymous ID: bbbd5a Aug. 26, 2025, 5:09 a.m. No.23510014   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0018

>>23510009

which is also a violation of the first amendment. Especially when it is under the guise of a hate crime. If it is your purchased flag you have every right to do what ever you wish to it including burning it, american, rainbow, or otherwise.

Anonymous ID: bbbd5a Aug. 26, 2025, 5:14 a.m. No.23510024   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23510018

100% but adding more bullshit on top of it does not solve that problem. If you want to arrest people for starting a open uncontrolled flame its a stretch but the only other way is if you take a flag off a government building but then its not your property. This double standard in the law is rampant and Trump doing this is bullshit and a guy was already arrested for it I believe yesterday afternoon a vet protesting.

Anonymous ID: bbbd5a Aug. 26, 2025, 5:40 a.m. No.23510073   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0117

>>23510065

other anon hit it, bout speech= expression and the slippery slope exists but if people can not criticize their own nation what is the point. Your examples are poor also, while you could semantically argue things, those are all acts of criminality. Direct cause of harm etc. Speech is the last bastion before things should get to a escalated point. So even with things you disagree with burning a flag would be considered this it could also be considered an artistic expression.

Anonymous ID: bbbd5a Aug. 26, 2025, 6:01 a.m. No.23510128   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23510117

The flag is just a symbol and the symbol matters but its just an object that is being destroyed as a sign of protest and of frustration with out becoming violent. Its a symbolic gesture by disenfranchised people like many anons are and have been. The incite violence part is interesting but you have to prove the line of connection this is why Trump order is weak. This is very similar to the idea of Brandenburg V. Ohio, in which there were standards to describe inciting violence. So that is the general defense but seeing as we are openly going to start calling into question every supreme court decision then why care about the law at all at that point.

Anonymous ID: bbbd5a Aug. 26, 2025, 6:17 a.m. No.23510176   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0184

>>23510168

you do coach that but i think your assessment is wrong, anons should be pissed about this are we going to follow the constitution or not. I get that much has been interpreted but then we are in a spiral and now the trust gets eroded in free speech and expression even more.

Anonymous ID: bbbd5a Aug. 26, 2025, 6:19 a.m. No.23510180   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23510171

no its not a game, you are just a little cowardly nigger faggot cunt.

 

>>23510175

It is not arson if its your own flag. There are already laws in place that can combat open fires in public areas, Trump doing this is a bitch move. I am using my words jack ass. Well I hope you just die. Kill yourself

Anonymous ID: bbbd5a Aug. 26, 2025, 6:22 a.m. No.23510190   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23510184

Oh i am so sorry my semantics did not please you , i couched its the way i did because there was a time when anons thought critically and defended free speech and did not suck trump off like a sycophant.