I mean come the fuck on, seriously BO/BV, can I have an explanation????

(top of pic1 WAS pic3)

(bottom of pic1 WAS pic4)

>>2351540

>(top of pic1 WAS pic3)

was pic 2

>(bottom of pic1 WAS pic4)

was pic 3

fucked that up

got completely distracted.. again.. when I saw my shit was deleted, but was going to post this:

https://www.popularmechanics.com/flight/a20916/visual-history-air-force-one/

its not unprecedented for AF1 to fly a decoy (only do it for overseas trips) but it IS UNPRECEDENTED to have it go the OPPOSITE direction

but knowing POTUS, being unprecedented doesn't mean shit

>>2351585

says the SAME redhead posting shill

kys already

>>2351591

kek

BAKER, follow my thought process on this:

I'm going to go, but I think ALL anons should see this.

I posted a pic the in sarah silverman thread as an example to try the PIxelKnot decoding that wasn't even related to anything porn/boobs/whatever, and it was deleted.

I posted a side by side that I've posted many times since I made it, even last bread, about the AF1 attack in june that shows all related crumbs and sauce/digs for each, and it was deleted.

I can understand if you don't, but I think anons should see this, and am therefore self nominating this as a notable:

>>2351540 >>2351549 An example of unwarranted deletions of a meme and side by side

if you don't follow/agree, I understand, but this is what some anons, including myself, were saying could happen

thanks for your consideration

>>2351638

yeeeup

but muh porn

same shit we've dealt with for months

>>2351643

you fucker

>>2351645

gtfo shill

go back to reddit and don't come back

>>2351651

no no you misunderstood

kek baker I know that, thats my point, THE BO/BV DELETED IT

I'm asking if you'd make the posts notable, these (reposting for clarity):

>>2351540 >>2351549 An example of unwarranted deletions of a meme and side by side

the BVs/BO haven't answered, and I'm leaving soon, so wondering if you'd make it a notable for other anons (dayshift) to see

>>2351656

ITS NOT PORN YOU GLOWING SHILL

>>2351627

agree

>>2351676

again, kys redhead shill

YOU WERE THE FUCKS POSTING CP LAST NIGHT

GET THE FUCK OUT

>>2351682

Like I give a fuck what a shill says

BVs/BO can check the fucking hash, was discussing AT LENGTH last bread

KYS SHILLS

>>2351689

>replaced

>threatened

those would be my picks

yet, I BELIEVE THE BO IS THE SAME PATRIOT HE'S ALWAYS BEEN, and knows this is starting to not feel right

>>2351700

(pic1 is what I thought could happen)

(pic2 is my proposed solution)

>>2351711

both, go reread last bread

>>2351713

and this:

>>2351725

kys faggot

ANONS READ THIS:

>>2351700

>>2351700

>>2351700

>>2351700

>>2351700

talk with the BO, the Battle of the Boobs can be resolved

>>2351730

read this shill: >>2351700

>>2351749

muh mods

back to reddit with all you shills

I'm bout to crash

I think this can be resolved

pic1 is a CLEAR example of how censorship is fucked up

pic2 is an idea

pic3 is a proposal

I supported you BO when we dealt with AFLB… for censoring

its started with muh porn (WHICH IS NOT FUCKING PORN FFS), then my (and who knows if any other anons' are effected) ACTUAL posts were deleted, whats next, bans, then blanket IP bans

THEN WE ARE RIGHT BACK TO WHERE WE STARTED WITH AFLB

this can be resolved, I really think it can, but this censorship CAN NOT STAND

THE BATTLE OF THE BOOBS IS NOT BEWBS, ITS ABOUT CENSORSHIP

and (pic1) is a CLEAR AND UNWARRANTED EXAMPLE

WWG1WGA

that being said, we will win, THEY HAVE ALREADY LOST

We stand.

We fight.

TOGETHER.

Organized riots being planned.

Counter measures in place.

Resistance far smaller than portrayed by MSM.

Attacks will intensify.

You, collectively, are a massive threat.

Censorship applied to scale down impact/reach.

It’s failing.

Trust yourself.

Public awakening.

Q

I mean, I CAN'T IMAGINE THIS IS WHAT YOU WANTED BO (pic goddamn related)