NO NUDITY! Did you even read?
A nude kid or pre-teen (under 18) is. So KYS too! BTFO!
But hey if the BO wants to go back on it, cool with me!
How do boobs look old enough? A little sag? I can tell you from experience. My wife has perky tits and she's far from 18. How about anyone posting any nude girls who look under 18 gets banned.
Legally you could still get in deep water if that 16 year old was posted by a deep state shill who took anyone in this board down and proved it.
They're looking for any excuse to shut 8ch down.
Whatever! You projecting motherfucker!
Viewers of CP get in just as much hot water. Don't kid yourself dude!
BO can do what they want. I understand where he's coming from and I support what he wants to do.
Anyone bitching about no tits is just as stupid as the shills you're bitching about. It's not the end of the world. Lots of tits out there. This board has gotten sidetracked anyhow by shills like you!
Ever heard of temporary internet files? As an IT guy, I can see anyone's porn history without even seeing what they've downloaded…
Who's Antifa?
I'm on your team. Just saw what the BO wrote and it does make sense to me. But do what you want. Don't let me stop you.
BOOBs don't = the same thing as freedom of speech. You can't do this shit in public as a woman. Can a woman just walk down the street nude in the US? Maybe in Vegas and NYC, but that's probably it. Online do what you want, but don't mix things up so you can do what you want.
You're acting like an anti-fascist fascist. FUCK OFF!
I see it as anything a pedo could wank to, but ok. Anyhow I'm done with the conversation. I say lets move on.
Go swallow Obama's dick, you punkass! I don't care about what the board does. You're the one being the dick here.
I know the difference between sexually explicit or not. I think any pre-teen pictures nude would be qualified as sexually explicit as that's not something that's typical. But telling how old someone is can be difficult. Because what's fair and legal for adults to pose as may not be so for 16 year olds who may pose the same way.
That's the only ambiguity I'm worried about and the BO is too.
And this guy seems to be defending the idea of Boobs being somehow important to the board that's actually mean for something else… Baker Girls used to be clothed or scantily clothed which no one seems to have minded. Then all of a sudden topless on the Qresearch board became in vogue. What's next? It's a slippery slope folks!
Lots of places to get your rocks off. Enjoy! You're the shill, not me.
They can GTFO the board. Any way to ban permanently? This debate over boobs is just shilling anyhow. A way to take attention away from important things. I like boobs as much as they do, but I see more than just a way to get my rocks off…+/- and gray areas in between.
One thing I have noticed is when I first started qresearch back in Nov on 4ch/pol, baker girls were clothed or in nice bathing suits. But lately lots of nudity which makes me think someone is trying to pull something… It's kind of how they're trying to add "MAP" to LGBTQIA blah blah blah for Minor Attracted Person. They're sneaky fucks and it doesn't surprise me one bit. Just be wary. I love 8ch and 4ch culture when it's legal. But if the board goes down because of the "culture", that's the trojan horse. Protect it carefully.
I meant Calm Before The Storm…Excuse me.
[[[2c6d76]]]