tyb
Democrat-run cities are plagued with crime because they choose to let it happen. It's not an accident—it's a masterclass in failure.
@PressSec drops the truth, WATCH 🔥
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1961204688226783424
.@StephenM: Democrats exist to serve illegal aliens, criminals, terrorists, gangbangers, and those who shelter and coddle them. They are society destroyers; they are city destroyers. President Trump and Republicans don't care about the feelings of criminals. 🔥
https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1961212397479399818
kek
FINAL QUESTION TO @REUTERS: If Jim Smith can chair Reuters charity training reporters and have a part-time job at @Pfizer, can Reuters reporters also have part-time jobs at the corporations they cover?
REUTERS: Can you please explain the basis for this question?
#ReutersFactCheck
https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pfizer-board-member-james-jim-smith
https://x.com/thackerpd/status/1961029203513544855
—
Pfizer Board Member James “Jim” Smith Also Chairs Reuters Charity That Helps "Bolster the Resilience of Independent Media.”
Can we just stop pretending there’s any daylight between Big Pharma and legacy media?
Paul D. Thacker | Aug 28, 2025
In yet another sign you can’t always believe the medical literature, journalist Maryanne Demasi reported a couple weeks back that a medical journal retracted a study critical of COVID vaccines because a Reuters fact check didn’t like it. Funny thing is, Reuters fact checkers never seems to like studies or commentators critiquing COVID vaccines, and always seeks to knock them down.
At least that’s what I reported back in March when I uncovered several fake Reuters fact checks that made scientifically false statements during the pandemic about COVID vaccines. When I asked their reporter at the time if they were going to go back and fix several “fact checks” that reported facts that were scientifically false, they didn’t respond.
Reuters is one of the largest newsrooms on the planet. And it’s not just that Reuters fact checkers constantly defend COVID vaccines, attacking any social media comment or published research that might harm the bottom line of Pfizer or other manufacturers, but they also have ignored several times when Pfizer itself put out false COVID vaccine information. Last year, a British regulator accused Pfizer of “bringing discredit” on the pharmaceutical industry for illegal COVID vaccine marketing.
…
https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/pfizer-board-member-james-jim-smith
Thank you to the dedicated men and women in uniform who are working tirelessly around the clock to protect our nation's capital. 🇺🇸
https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1961242468004815327
The lawsuits will continue until the morale improves!
https://x.com/HarmeetKDhillon/status/1961203440077463695
—
Minnesota politicians have created a toxic environment for their constituents & their complete lack of self awareness will no longer stand. Time to take a look in the mirror!
https://x.com/AAGDhillon/status/1961203202340065728
‘Undercover’ Spy At Center Of WSJ Sob Story Is Actually A Public CIA Russia Hoaxer
By: M.D. Kittle | August 28, 2025
https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/28/undercover-spy-at-center-of-wsj-sob-story-is-actually-a-public-cia-russia-hoaxer/
The hit piece blasting Intelligence Chief Tulsi Gabbard for outing omnipresent CIA agent Julia Gurganus is filled with falsities.
We’ve grown accustomed to corporate media lying to us. It’s the lazy lies that are perhaps most galling.
The Wall Street Journal’s recent overheated piece on the Trump administration’s public revocation of an “undercover” senior CIA officer is ridiculously lazy. The CIA spook in question is a very overt member of the intelligence community. Just Google the name Julia Gurganus.
‘Zero Concerns’
Wall Street Journal national security reporter Brett Forrest on Wednesday reported that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard’s naming of Gurganus on a list of 37 current and former officials stripped of their national security clearances has “alarmed people” inside the CIA.
“Gabbard didn’t know the CIA officer had been working undercover, according to a person familiar with the fallout from the list’s release,” Forrest wrote in the hit piece headlined, “Tulsi Gabbard Blindsided CIA Over Revoking Clearance of Undercover Officer.” He noted “three other people with knowledge of the situation” who claimed the DNI “didn’t meaningfully consult with the CIA before releasing the list.”
Wrong, multiple sources with knowledge of the situation say. A senior intelligence official tells The Federalist that there was indeed staff-level coordination between the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the CIA, as well as other agencies involved, ahead of the distribution of the revocations letter.
…
https://thefederalist.com/2025/08/28/undercover-spy-at-center-of-wsj-sob-story-is-actually-a-public-cia-russia-hoaxer/