Stop responding to the WeWantBewbs (((shills))). They are trying to sow dissension and nothing more. Ignore or filter, but don't give them (ewes).
Lurking Baker in the House
I thought we were trying to stop the avatarFagging and nameFagging as bakers.
-
BV or BO is supposed to monitor handoffs.
-
There is nothing to stop a shill from grabbing the avatars and pretending to be the avatarBaker.
-
Most bakers recognize each other without the avatars.
-
I would guess ClamBaker can tell who I am, and I've done nothing to show which LurkingBaker I might be to most anons.
KEK… Yeah. I'm sure they haven't thought of it. The C_A/MOS types wouldn't do it, but the ShariaBlew would.
20 posts and sowing dissension… This, anons, is how you spot a shill.
Agreed. But the only ones who have to recognize each other are those during handoff. It really doesn't matter to most anons who baked, as long as it is good bread.
If the clowns aren't doing that, then they don't deserve their big shoes or red noses.
It is my opinion that Q came here for several reasons:
-
Anons showed great ingenuity in tracking down the ShiaFlag with many minds working toward a single purpose.
-
These boards are the last free speech bastion on the planet. There is no control, even if there are boundaries.
-
These boards are truly anonymous, so no one knows who anyone else is without the anon slipping up and self-doxing in some way.
-
These boards are real people who question everything and don't believe anything without proof.
Q may have had other reasons, but I firmly believe everything above played into the decision.
I remember Janet Reno saying Trump wouldn't be president in her lifetime, too.
How'd that work out for her?