Anonymous ID: 528ef8 July 30, 2018, 4:55 a.m. No.2352890   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2919

>>2352871

most accept is to not start diffisionfagging

and honestly, as long as they don´t use it to make a persona (participating on the bread demanding respect for nothing but the name) out of themself i would argue that is does no harm.

(they will get identified by bo/bv anyway. you could start the namefag calling there if you want. but that´s what we´ve came up with)

Anonymous ID: 528ef8 July 30, 2018, 5:04 a.m. No.2352944   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2955 >>2963 >>2969

>>2352919

as i already explained

>"they will get identified by bo/bv anyway"

<rendering the "Anon" not an anon.

i don´t think you will get my point.

with the current baker vetting system it is impossible for a baker to stay "truly" anon.