>>5208744
I'm not seeing the correlation to "bots".
How do we know? Well, i would hope that the original q posts, along with automated extractors would do 50% of the surface work and give automated guidance to the anon's to perform further digging and analysis. It can't be completely automated without significant investment of time and resources into NLP to enable the "context" extraction of information.
These tools do exist in the sense that if you have a multiple letter acronym to your organization or millions of dollars…. aside from that there is no open aggregator.
In order to archive, we can distribute the "store" to multiple nodes and perform offline backups. That way if attacks are successful new nodes can be spun up quickly and fill the gap.
Also needs to be done in an anonymous fashion to prevent doxing and safe guard people's identity.
Ideally, by aggregating into a graph, we could generate customized timelines/relationships/analysis with a simple query. This could then be rendered in the form of a "social timeline" to show the progression of a drop->outcome.