Domestic enemy COWARD has a problem with feeding the homeless.

I don't care what the Supreme Court (Judicial) says, I don't care what Congress (Legislature) says, I don't care what the President and DOJ (Executive) says, I don't care what ANYONE says, or any law they make, they can all kiss my ass if they think they can deprive the most basic of rights to feed and support our brothers and sisters. People have the RIGHT to peacefully assemble in public, and that includes to hand out food, so fuck every single domestic enemy who thinks it should be illegal or enforces it.

>>23528836

>Domestic enemy COWARD has a problem with feeding the homeless.

>>23528844

>Sheesh.

>Article says LEFT hand when image clearly is RIGHT hand.

A mirror is also called a looking glass.

>>23528851

"Purgatory"

>>23528865

The RIGHT to peacefully assemble in public, they were not blocking the street.

It's funny cops get to block the street, fire departments get to block the streets (I'm not talking about in emergencies either) mayors and their parades get to block streets, but the peoples RIGHTS are somehow a problem.

Our rights are ABOVE the voter, that's the point of the Constitution.

>>23528910

No they do not. Again, the peoples rights are ABOVE the voter. The Constitution protects the right of the voter to peacefully assemble in public, not only where government or the voter says so. He was basically in a parking spot because of the way cars were parked, not blocking the street.

>>23528934

>Just like field so riety tests

You know those are optional in all 50 states and are not covered under "implied consent" right?

>>23528957

Constitutional Representative Republic.

Even if every voter decides that YOU can't speak, your constitutionally protected freedom of speech trumps their will.

Tell me, until government unconstitutionally gave themselves immunity, how exactly would congress amend the second amendment to infringe the right to keep and bear arms, as amending it to do so would be a violation of the constitution?

We are not a democracy.

>>23528962

>privilege to drive

Wrong. No matter what the lawless USSC said, driving is NOT a mere privilege but a RIGHT that can be regulated for safety.

Government can not deny a drivers license to a person of equal qualifications, as it is a RIGHT, no matter what word USSC called it.

Yes, understanding road signs is a qualification, I'm not arguing about that, but driving absolutely is not a mere privilege.

>>23529054

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the peoplepeaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Not when it violates a right, and it is a right to peacefully assemble in public. They could have gone to the sidewalk, a traditional public forum, but the cop unlawfully ordered them to stop and leave.

>>23529112

>The law enforcement officer is employed and empowered by the town, city, municipality, or county to enforce local ordinances

Not when it violates a right. Rights are above law enforcements authority.

>>23529126

Yes I know, I post videos here of domestic enemies blatantly violating rights all the time.

Force does not determine lawful. Just because cops get away with beating or killing people doesn't make it lawful. A judge claiming a constitutionally protected right is not lawful does not suddenly negate a right. It makes them domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States and We the People it represents.

>>23529158

Violating rights under color of law is LITERALLY a crime and violation of the US Constitution. continuing to violate them, and defending those violations, makes one a domestic enemy to the Constitution of the United States.

>>23529215

I told you, force does not decide lawful. Stop with the sovereign citizen controlled opposition bullshit.

I have no problem telling someone they're a domestic enemy, and any law enforcement or judge enforcing any law, statute, or ordinance, even those "On the books" that violates constitutionally protected rights is an enemy to the Constitution.

“A Law repugnant to the Constitution is void." - US Supreme Court Chief Justice Marshall writing the majority opinion in Marbury v. Madison (1803).

You seem to be under the delusion that if all of government is lawless, it some how makes it lawful because they use force to keep the population under control.

>>23529239

Enjoy licking those boots.

>>23529265

You mean who violate the rights of the people and constitution they swore to uphold and protect daily nationwide. They are domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States and We the People it represents.

>>23529276

>Negative

>Fourth Amendment

>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

>Fifth Amendment

>No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

>>23529286

A father disciplines one He loves. Love doesn't mean ignoring crimes against the people and their rights, love means telling them they're doing wrong.

>>23529314

>Every memeber of law enforcement in the US has failed to uphold and protect the peoples rights, they stood WITH the very domestic enemies they swore to defend us from.

Yes, ALL cops. They need ask themselves what their root is.

>>23529327

Oops first line shouldn't be a quote

>>23529338

They're not performing their duty, they're violating their duty and oath.

They are domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States, violating rights, constitution, and laws under color of law and propping up a system of lawlessness.

>>23529338

>too often that 'tell them' thing is done at the wrong time and it's really interfering with an officer while they are in a critical task

I forgot to point out, the US Supreme Court disagreed with you when they invalidated as unconstitutional a Houston Texas ordinance that read "“It shall be unlawful for any person to assault, strike or in any manner oppose, molest, abuse or interrupt any policeman in the execution of his duty, or any person summoned to aid in making an arrest.”

As Justice William J. Brennan Jr., who authored the Court’s 8-1 majority opinion, wrote that “freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.”

"Telling them" is NOT interference.

>>23529380

Their "giving" is the violation of our rights and constitution.

They are criminals and domestic enemies, they should be treated like it.

>>23529445

You mean you can't go on defending their lawlessness this evening.