Anonymous ID: 47a408 July 30, 2018, 5:50 a.m. No.2353215   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3226

>>2353198

Wow you are an idiot. So to question something the POTUS does means all of that? It appears as though the 4-6% has not fallen far from /pol/ has it now?

 

I will question ANYONE and ANYTHING that does not seem right to my. It is the province of a FREE MAN you communist faggot cunt. There are places for people like you, it is within the crowds of Antifa fascists getting your ass kicked by actual free thinking patriots. I can only hope you have not spawned a drone you would call a son. The world has enough shit in it already

Anonymous ID: 47a408 July 30, 2018, 6:11 a.m. No.2353364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3397 >>3417

>>2353362

I for one would never believe that. He is a jesuit, they are taught to say whatever they need to say and to play all sides to achieve whatever result they are tasked with. You can NEVER trust a jesuit

Anonymous ID: 47a408 July 30, 2018, 6:14 a.m. No.2353402   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2353379

By this logic, we should have no German anons right? I mean because Hitler was German and our public educations all taught us how terribad he is right?

 

Censoring is censoring now matter how you try to spin it.

Anonymous ID: 47a408 July 30, 2018, 6:26 a.m. No.2353488   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2353463

 

Don't you find it odd though that the list of enemy states that they have are predominantly Islamic? Do you know what the main rub between the Jew and the Muslim culture is? It is usury. Usury is illegal under Islamic law so there is not now nor will there ever be a central bank in a traditional Islamic state, you know the ones who control the oil of the world? That is too much to be a coincidence

Anonymous ID: 47a408 July 30, 2018, 6:32 a.m. No.2353533   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3584

>>2353515

its not about that no matter how much you and the others try to use logical fallacy to make it so. The issue is that people here do not like to be told what they can and cannot say. It is a bastardization of the culture that has existed for a long fucking time before Q ever came to be on this broad. THAT is the issue. No matter what side you are on, you are being dishonest if your argument for your side considered any other motive for the dissent over the decision